Structured Reporting in Radiology

Ganeshan, Dhakshinamoorthy; Duong, Phuong-Anh T.; Probyn, Linda; Lenchik, Leon; McArthur, Tatum A.; Retrouvey, Michele; Ghobadi, Emily H.; Desouches, Stephane L.; Pastel, David A.; Francis, Isaac R.

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005

Cited by 165 publications

(113 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

100

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Where possible, radiologists should be encouraged to discuss with the surgeons what they would like included in the imaging report, so that the reports produced can be consistent, clear, and clinically useful. The use of structured checklist‐style reports that prompt the radiologist to include such details as the diameter of the shunt insertion, could also be considered to improve reporting consistency . A consensus statement promoting a standard reporting format for extrahepatic portosystemic shunts has not been published, and the results of this study would be helpful to guide its development.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey of surgical specialists’ content preferences in radiology reports for extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Plested

Drees

2019

Vet Radiology Ultrasound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this prospective, survey study was to assess the opinions of specialist surgeons as to the preferred content, nomenclature, and classification of extrahepatic portosystemic shunts for inclusion in radiology reports. A link to an online survey was sent by email to members of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons and the Association of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgeons, and was made available on the American College of Veterinary Surgeons web forum and Facebook page. There were 93 respondents (survey sent to over 2500 email addresses and made available in two online locations). Most respondents agreed that they both review the images themselves (87/92, 95%) and read the radiology report (82/92, 89%) prior to surgery. Most respondents believed that the radiology report should contain a detailed anatomic description of the insertion (83/92, 90%), origin (54/91, 59%), and course (70/92, 76%) of the shunt, as well as a measure of the diameter of the shunting vessel at its insertion (54/92, 59%). Most respondents (70/90, 78%) disagreed that a brief description of shunt type, such as portocaval or portophrenic, was sufficient. Respondents were undecided regarding the use of an alphanumeric classification system (36/92, 39% agree; 32/92, 35% disagree). There was agreement that details of the presence or absence of urolithiasis (91/93, 98%), renomegaly (54/93, 58%), and peritoneal fluid (72/92, 78%) should be included in the report. The results of this study will help to guide reporting radiologists in providing descriptions of extrahepatic portosystemic shunts that include information most preferred by the recipient surgeons. K E Y W O R D Scomputed tomography, portosystemic shunt, radiologist, structured reporting

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey of surgical specialists’ content preferences in radiology reports for extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Plested

Drees

2019

Vet Radiology Ultrasound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the concern regarding an increase in the time required for reporting is not without cause. Some studies on the topic indicate that radiologists feel that the use of report templates is restrictive and time-consuming [38,39]. However, other studies were able to show that the use of corresponding templates for traumatological examination reporting did not have a significant effect on the time needed to create a report [40].…”

Section: Limitations In Routine Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Structured Reporting in Clinical Routine

Santos

Hempel

Mildenberger

et al. 2018

Fortschr Röntgenstr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the fact that the radiology report represents their primary work product, radiologists tend to be emotionally invested in the language of the report (5). The concept of report standardization can feel threatening to radiologists' sense of autonomy.…”

Section: Technical Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The advent of voice recognition software in radiology has enabled the use of sophisticated report templates, allowing for increased efficiency and decreased errors in reporting (1,2). Radiology practices are increasingly adopting standardized report templates to overcome the drawbacks of individual templates (3), which include time consumed in report creation, incompleteness, heterogeneity and errors that tend to proliferate as reports are organically created and shared, difficulty in making practice-wide changes, and the inability to improve the reports over time (4,5). Despite the advantages, implementing a standardized structured reporting program is not straightforward (6).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategies for Implementing a Standardized Structured Radiology Reporting Program

Larson

2018

RadioGraphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Structured Reporting in Radiology

Cited by 165 publications

References 66 publications

Survey of surgical specialists’ content preferences in radiology reports for extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Survey of surgical specialists’ content preferences in radiology reports for extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Structured Reporting in Clinical Routine

Strategies for Implementing a Standardized Structured Radiology Reporting Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About