2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured adsorbents in gas separation processes

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this review, novel structured adsorbents for gas separation processes are discussed. General requirements are elucidated and illustrated with respect to specific structures such as monoliths, foams, laminates, and fabric structures. Geometrical parameters of adsorbents which affect the system performance are identified and discussed. It is clear that opportunities for improvement and optimization of adsorptive gas separation processes should include the development of improved structured adso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
209
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
209
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In packed reactors and adsorbent towers some of the potential advantages of structured foam and honey-comb type monoliths over random packings (e.g. beads, extruded pellets, and granules) include lower bed pressure drops and higher packing densities of the catalytic or adsorption sites in a vessel [2][3][4]. Foam-like carbon monoliths with open cellular structures may also provide better radial mixing of fluids in packed beds than the typical linear macro channels in honeycomb monolith, and any enhanced heat and mass transfer in carbon foams could be utilized to reduce contact times in reactors or pressure swing adsorption systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In packed reactors and adsorbent towers some of the potential advantages of structured foam and honey-comb type monoliths over random packings (e.g. beads, extruded pellets, and granules) include lower bed pressure drops and higher packing densities of the catalytic or adsorption sites in a vessel [2][3][4]. Foam-like carbon monoliths with open cellular structures may also provide better radial mixing of fluids in packed beds than the typical linear macro channels in honeycomb monolith, and any enhanced heat and mass transfer in carbon foams could be utilized to reduce contact times in reactors or pressure swing adsorption systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 summaries the isosteric heat of adsorption results. The heats of adsorption were in the ranges 22 -26 kJ/mol for CO 2 at loadings of 2 -3 mmol/g, 21 -22.7 kJ/mol for N 2 at loadings of 0.1 -0.6 mmol/g, and 6 -8 kJ/mol for CH 4 at loadings of 0.2 -1.2 mmol/g. The values of CO 2 isosteric heat of adsorption on ACD18-053 in this study similar to the range of reported values for other activated carbons [46] and isoteric heats of adsorption for N 2 are also similar to other reported ranges for similar pressures and coverages [47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,33,35 The combination of an optimized temperature and pressure during PCP has resulted in structured monoliths of AlPO 4 -17 and AlPO 4 -53 with a high CO 2 capture capacity and a relatively high mechanical strength ( Table 1). The CO 2 and N 2 uptake on these monoliths of AlPO 4 -17 and AlPO 4 -53 (Fig.…”
Section: 32-34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large pressure drop can result in clogs or blockages in some gas separation processes. 8,9 Typically, structured adsorbents are produced by shaping a mixture of the porous powder with an inorganic and organic binder into a body of the desired geometry. [10][11][12] The powder body is thermally treated to increase the mechanical strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%