2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–property relations of 55nm particle-toughened epoxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the tensile-fractured surface of the 11.5 vol% blend exhibited fibril-like morphology-evidence of large scale deformation caused matrix shear yielding; these phenomena demonstrate considerable strong interfacial adhesion between PLA and BE phases, leading to a significant improvement of toughness of PLA. Similar behavior was observed before for compatibilized blend [56] and highly toughened epoxy blends [57]. 11.5 vol% BE.…”
Section: Morphology Of Fracture Surfacesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the tensile-fractured surface of the 11.5 vol% blend exhibited fibril-like morphology-evidence of large scale deformation caused matrix shear yielding; these phenomena demonstrate considerable strong interfacial adhesion between PLA and BE phases, leading to a significant improvement of toughness of PLA. Similar behavior was observed before for compatibilized blend [56] and highly toughened epoxy blends [57]. 11.5 vol% BE.…”
Section: Morphology Of Fracture Surfacesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is proved by over 20,000 publications on epoxy1 inorganic particle composites over the past 10 years as shown Fig. 2 Comparison ofnanocomposites with composites in terms of a Surface-smface interparticle dkdistance and b Teal particle surface area in 1 mm3 [8] in Fig. 4 Figure 5 shows how these fillers are distinbarrier property and thenndelectrical conductivities [33-371. guished by their respective total surface area, geometry The high surface area and uniform dispersion are the two key and size.…”
Section: Epoxy-based Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[49,50] Both nanocomposites show obvious higher T g s than neat epoxy, because the Gd 2 O 3 nanoparticles pose barriers to the vibration of matrix molecules through the T g region and thus cause longer relaxation time, in agreement with our previous research where nanoparticles increased the T g of neat epoxy. [21,29,33] Once the interface modification bridges the nanoparticles with matrix, there is a low level of interface slippage between nanoparticles and matrix under dynamic loading, which means a more pronounced barrier effect. Therefore, the epoxy/m-Gd 2 O 3 nanocomposite should show a higher T g than the epoxy/m-Gd 2 O 3 , which is contradictory to what is shown in Figure 11.…”
Section: Fractographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] New tougheners developed so far include silicate layers, [21,[23][24][25][26] silica nanoparticles, [27][28][29][30][31] block copolymer nanoparticles [32][33] and rubber nanoparticles. [33] In contrast, no metal nanoparticle has been proposed to toughen epoxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%