1939
DOI: 10.1037/h0054179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure or function in the definition of learning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning as change in behavior Kellogg (1938) change "in activity" Kellogg & Britt (1939) persisting change or modification of behavior "which results from the activity of the organisms itself and which tends to adapt the organism to its environment" Hilgard & Bower (1975) relatively permanent change "…in a subject's behavior to a given situation brought about by his (or her) repeated experiences in that situation, provided that the behavior change cannot be explained on the basis of native response tendencies, maturation, or temporary states of the subject (e.g., fatigue, drugs, etc.)" Rescorla (1988) process "…by which an organism benefits from experience so that its future behaviour is better adapted to its environment" Lefrancois (1986) change "in behavior resulting from experience" Hall (2003) process "in which an animal (human or non-human) interacts with its environment and becomes changed by this experience so that its subsequent behaviour is modified" According to Langley & Simon (1981), Steiner (1988), Rescorla (1988), Good & Brophy (1990), Anderson (1995), Lachman (1997), Hall (2003), Mazur (2013), Barron et al (2015) and Jablonka & Ginsburg (2022) the concept of learning refers to a process.…”
Section: Formulating the Conceptual Problem Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning as change in behavior Kellogg (1938) change "in activity" Kellogg & Britt (1939) persisting change or modification of behavior "which results from the activity of the organisms itself and which tends to adapt the organism to its environment" Hilgard & Bower (1975) relatively permanent change "…in a subject's behavior to a given situation brought about by his (or her) repeated experiences in that situation, provided that the behavior change cannot be explained on the basis of native response tendencies, maturation, or temporary states of the subject (e.g., fatigue, drugs, etc.)" Rescorla (1988) process "…by which an organism benefits from experience so that its future behaviour is better adapted to its environment" Lefrancois (1986) change "in behavior resulting from experience" Hall (2003) process "in which an animal (human or non-human) interacts with its environment and becomes changed by this experience so that its subsequent behaviour is modified" According to Langley & Simon (1981), Steiner (1988), Rescorla (1988), Good & Brophy (1990), Anderson (1995), Lachman (1997), Hall (2003), Mazur (2013), Barron et al (2015) and Jablonka & Ginsburg (2022) the concept of learning refers to a process.…”
Section: Formulating the Conceptual Problem Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the March 1939 issue of this publication another paper (7) in the Cason and Kellogg-Britt series (1-7) appeared in which Britt and Kellogg declare, "There is surely no such thing as 'one correct and perfect definition of learning ' . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%