2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505581102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of trigger factor binding domain in biologically homologous complex with eubacterial ribosome reveals its chaperone action

Abstract: Trigger factor (TF), the first chaperone in eubacteria to encounter the emerging nascent chain, binds to the large ribosomal subunit in the vicinity of the protein exit tunnel opening and forms a sheltered folding space. Here, we present the 3.5-Å crystal structure of the physiological complex of the large ribosomal subunit from the eubacterium Deinococcus radiodurans with the N-terminal domain of TF (TFa) from the same organism. For anchoring, TFa exploits a small ribosomal surface area in the vicinity of pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
87
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our finding that TF was able to transiently shield nascent polypeptides exposing up to 37 or 41 kDa outside the ribosome raises the question of how such large proteins can be accommodated underneath TF. It is possible that the cavity formed between the ribosomal surface and the N-terminal tail and C-terminal arms of TF can adopt a significantly larger volume (Ͼ14 kDa) than originally anticipated based on the structural models (5)(6)(7)15). Another explanation is that large nascent polypeptides are incorporated underneath the entire TF molecule additionally involving the C-terminal region beyond the C-terminal arms and perhaps the PPIase domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our finding that TF was able to transiently shield nascent polypeptides exposing up to 37 or 41 kDa outside the ribosome raises the question of how such large proteins can be accommodated underneath TF. It is possible that the cavity formed between the ribosomal surface and the N-terminal tail and C-terminal arms of TF can adopt a significantly larger volume (Ͼ14 kDa) than originally anticipated based on the structural models (5)(6)(7)15). Another explanation is that large nascent polypeptides are incorporated underneath the entire TF molecule additionally involving the C-terminal region beyond the C-terminal arms and perhaps the PPIase domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, the models predict different volumes for the space formed by the ribosomal surface and the N-terminal tail and C-terminal arms of TF. While two models propose that this space resembles a cavity which is large enough to accommodate protein domains or small proteins of ϳ14 kDa or even larger (5,6), the third model suggests a rather narrow crevice more suitable to bind an unfolded polypeptide (7). These contradictory models of the conformation of TF on the ribosome make it difficult to define a mechanism of action for TF and do not further clarify what effects TF exerts on nascent polypeptides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the hydrophobic character of the nascent chain only moderately affected the residence time of TF on the ribosome, as measured with TF-B, but rather increased the on-rate for TF binding to the ribosome, presumably by providing additional interaction surfaces. Thus, whereas TF binding to the L23/L29 docking site on the ribosome is a prerequisite for nascent chain interaction, resulting in a conformational change in TF that facilitates nascent chain association (16,19), the presence of hydrophobic elements in the nascent chain emerging from the ribosome appears to increase the avidity of TF for ribosome docking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second contact involves ribosomal protein L29, which is not essential for TF-ribosome interaction (6). In the Deinococcus radiodurans co-crystal structure, the TF N-domain undergoes a conformational change in the ribosomebound form (19). As a result, the N-domain exposes hydrophobic surfaces toward the opening of the ribosomal exit tunnel, presumably providing a binding surface for the emerging nascent chain that would be absent in the non-ribosome bound form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRP and TF together can bind to the ribosome, although both contact protein L23 at the peptide exit ( Fig. 1) 3,[14][15][16][17][18] ; changes in crosslinking patterns indicate that conformational changes accompany the accommodation of the two ligands on one ribosome 19,20 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%