The N-end rule states that the half-life of a protein is determined by the nature of its amino-terminal residue. Eukaryotes and prokaryotes use N-terminal destabilizing residues as a signal to target proteins for degradation by the N-end rule pathway. In eukaryotes an E3 ligase, N-recognin, recognizes N-end rule substrates and mediates their ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. In Escherichia coli, N-end rule substrates are degraded by the AAA + chaperone ClpA in complex with the ClpP peptidase (ClpAP). Little is known of the molecular mechanism by which N-end rule substrates are initially selected for proteolysis. Here we report that the ClpAP-specific adaptor, ClpS, is essential for degradation of N-end rule substrates by ClpAP in bacteria. ClpS binds directly to N-terminal destabilizing residues through its substrate-binding site distal to the ClpS-ClpA interface, and targets these substrates to ClpAP for degradation. Degradation by the N-end rule pathway is more complex than anticipated and several other features are involved, including a net positive charge near the N terminus and an unstructured region between the N-terminal signal and the folded protein substrate. Through interaction with this signal, ClpS converts the ClpAP machine into a protease with exquisitely defined specificity, ideally suited to regulatory proteolysis.

Ribosomes synthesizing inner membrane proteins in Escherichia coli are targeted to the translocon in the plasma membrane by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor, FtsY. Here we show using a purified system that membrane targeting does not require an exposed signal-anchor sequence, as SRP-dependent targeting takes place with ribosomes containing short nascent peptides, with or without a signal-anchor sequence, within the peptide exit tunnel. Signaling from inside the tunnel involves ribosomal protein L23, which constitutes part of the SRP binding site. When nascent peptides emerge from the ribosome, the targeting complex is maintained with ribosomes exposing a signal-anchor sequence, whereas ribosomes exposing other sequences are released. These results indicate that ribosome-nascent chain complexes containing any nascent peptide within the exit tunnel can enter the SRP targeting pathway to be sorted at the membrane into ribosome-nascent chain complexes that synthesize either membrane or cytosolic proteins.

Ribosomes synthesizing inner membrane proteins in Escherichia coli are targeted to the membrane by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. By rapid kinetic analysis we show that after initial binding to the ribosome, SRP undergoes dynamic fluctuations in search of additional interactions. Non-translating ribosomes, or ribosomes synthesizing non-membrane proteins, do not provide these contacts, allowing SRPs to dissociate rapidly. A nascent peptide in the exit tunnel stabilizes SRPs in a standby state. Binding to the emerging signal-anchor sequence (SAS) of a nascent membrane protein halts the fluctuations of SRP, resulting in complex stabilization and recruitment of the SRP receptor. We propose a kinetic model where SRP rapidly scans all ribosomes until it encounters a ribosome exposing an SAS. Binding to the SAS switches SRP into the targeting mode, in which dissociation is slow and docking of the SRP receptor is accelerated.

Nascent proteins emerging from translating ribosomes in bacteria are screened by a number of ribosome-associated protein biogenesis factors, among them the chaperone trigger factor (TF), the signal recognition particle (SRP) that targets ribosomes synthesizing membrane proteins to the membrane and the modifying enzymes, peptide deformylase (PDF) and methionine aminopeptidase (MAP). Here, we examine the interplay between these factors both kinetically and at equilibrium. TF rapidly scans the ribosomes until it is stabilized on ribosomes presenting TF-specific nascent chains. SRP binding to those complexes is strongly impaired. Thus, TF in effect prevents SRP binding to the majority of ribosomes, except those presenting SRP-specific signal sequences, explaining how the small amount of SRP in the cell can be effective in membrane targeting. PDF and MAP do not interfere with TF or SRP binding to translating ribosomes, indicating that nascent-chain processing can take place before or in parallel with TF or SRP binding.

Proteins are co-translationally inserted into the bacterial plasma membrane via the SecYEG translocon by lateral release of hydrophobic transmembrane segments into the phospholipid bilayer. The trigger for lateral opening of the translocon is not known. Here we monitor lateral opening by photo-induced electron transfer (PET) between two fluorophores attached to the two SecY helices at the rim of the gate. In the resting translocon, the fluorescence is quenched, consistent with a closed conformation. Ribosome binding to the translocon diminishes PET quenching, indicating opening of the gate. The effect is larger with ribosomes exposing hydrophobic transmembrane segments and vanishes at low temperature. We propose a temperature-dependent dynamic equilibrium between closed and open conformations of the translocon that is shifted towards partially and fully open by ribosome binding and insertion of a hydrophobic peptide, respectively. The combined effects of ribosome and peptide binding allow for co-translational membrane insertion of successive transmembrane segments.

SummaryProteins are inserted into the bacterial plasma membrane cotranslationally after translating ribosomes are targeted to the translocon in the membrane via the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. The targeting pathway involves an interaction between SRP and the SRP receptor, FtsY. Here we focus on the role of FtsY and its interaction with the translocon in controlling targeting. We show that in unbound FtsY the NG and A domains interact with one another. The interaction involves the membrane-targeting region at the junction between A and N domain. The closed form of FtsY is impaired in binding to SRP. Upon binding to the phospholipid-embedded translocon the domains of FtsY move apart. This enhances the docking of the FtsY NG domain to the homologous NG domain of the SRP protein Ffh. Thus, FtsY binding to the translocon has a central role in orchestrating the formation of a quaternary transfer complex in which the nascent peptide is transferred to the translocon. We propose that FtsY activation at the translocon ensures that ribosome-SRP complexes are directed to available translocons. This way sequestering SRP in futile complexes with unbound FtsY can be avoided and efficient targeting to the translocon achieved.

Integral membrane proteins in bacteria are co‐translationally targeted to the SecYEG translocon for membrane insertion via the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. The SRP receptor FtsY and its N‐terminal A domain, which is lacking in any structural model of FtsY, were studied using NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. The A domain is mainly disordered and highly flexible; it binds to lipids via its N terminus and the C‐terminal membrane targeting sequence. The central A domain binds to the translocon non‐specifically and maintains disorder. Translocon targeting and binding of the A domain is driven by electrostatic interactions. The intrinsically disordered A domain tethers FtsY to the translocon, and because of its flexibility, allows the FtsY NG domain to scan a large area for binding to the NG domain of ribosome‐bound SRP, thereby promoting the formation of the quaternary transfer complex at the membrane.

Integral membrane proteins in bacteria are cotranslationally targeted to the SecYEG translocon for membrane insertion via the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway.T he SRP receptor FtsY and its N-terminal A domain, which is lacking in any structural model of FtsY, were studied using NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. The A domain is mainly disordered and highly flexible;i tb inds to lipids via its Nt erminus and the C-terminal membrane targeting sequence.T he central Ad omain binds to the translocon non-specifically and maintains disorder. Translocon targeting and binding of the Ad omain is driven by electrostatic interactions.T he intrinsically disordered A domain tethers FtsY to the translocon, and because of its flexibility,allows the FtsY NG domain to scan alarge area for binding to the NG domain of ribosome-bound SRP,t hereby promoting the formation of the quaternary transfer complex at the membrane.Co-translational targeting of nascent membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum of eukaryotic cells or the plasma membrane of bacteria is elicited via the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway.S RP rapidly scans translating ribosomes and targets those synthesizing membrane proteins to the protein-conducting channel (SecYEG in bacteria), located in the membrane,b ya ni nteraction with the SRP receptor,F tsY in bacteria. FtsY must be bound to the membrane to be functional, [1] that is,torecruit SRP and form the transfer complex at the SecYEG translocon.[2] Tw o regions of FtsY,t he N-terminal Ad omain and ar egion at the interface between Aand Ndomain (membrane targeting sequence,M TS) (Figure 1a), are involved in lipid binding as shown by cross-linking experiments. [1a,3] Cross-linking experiments also indicated that the Adomain binds to the exposed cytosolic C4/C5 loops of SecY.[4] Unlike the NG domain, which is fully structured, [5] the N-terminal Adomain is lacking in any structural model of FtsY,unbound or in complex with the translocon SecYEG or with SRP bound to ar ibosomenascent-chain complex (RNC). Therefore,and based on H/D exchange experiments,t he Ad omain of FtsY was suggested to be intrinsically disordered. [3c, 6] Herein we use solution NMR spectroscopy and fluorescence measurements to study FtsY and interactions of the A domain with membrane phospholipids and SecYEG embedded in E. coli phospholipids containing nanodiscs.W es how with single-residue resolution that the Ad omain is highly flexible and exhibits properties of an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP). [7] Our data indicate that the positively charged N-terminal region of the Ad omain and the C-terminal membrane targeting sequence (MTS) binds to phospholipids, presumably adopting an a-helical conformation. Interestingly,wefind that the negatively charged central region of the Adomain binds to the translocon non-specifically,most likely mediated by electrostatic interactions with the positively charged cytoplasmic loops of SecY and maintaining intrinsic disorder.2 H 15 N 13 C-labeled FtsY as well as ac onstruc...