2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the refractive index distribution of the supersonic turbulent boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 9 , the streamwise density field is the expected layered-ellipse shape, and the size of the density structure increases with the wall height, which is consistent with current research conclusions [ 10 , 30 ]. Since the spanwise density field is composed of many two-dimensional density fields, it has no specific shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 9 , the streamwise density field is the expected layered-ellipse shape, and the size of the density structure increases with the wall height, which is consistent with current research conclusions [ 10 , 30 ]. Since the spanwise density field is composed of many two-dimensional density fields, it has no specific shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…OPD h (x, y) is the blurring component. Substituting Equation (30) into Equation (29) and using the phase shift properties of the Fourier transform, the total light field can be represented by the light field of the blurring component…”
Section: Applying Tsao To Analyzing the Aperture Effects Of A Star Sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model reasonably predicts all the important aero-optical characteristics of non-adiabaticwall subsonic boundary layers; it also correctly predicts OPD rms for supersonic adiabatic boundary layers. 23 Because the density correlation lengths 42 and normalized pressure variations 43 are similar for subsonic and supersonic speeds, the model predictions can be extended to the supersonic non-adiabatic regime. Results of the predicted levels of OPD rms at different Mach numbers and temperature differences, adjusted to match experimental results at subsonic speeds, are shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Extension To Supersonic Speedsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the longitudinal direction they are much greater than in the transverse one. In the latter case, as follows from [26], the scale of correlation of inhomogeneities L K is equal to tenth fractions of the cross dimensions of the flow. The shock wave cross section along the beam propagation direction (transverse to the flow) equals 0.55 m [ Figs.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Phase Screens Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The outer scale L 0 for each screen was specified by the boundaries of the computational grid, since the scales of variation of the mean density In simulation of laser beam propagation through the shock wave we set 9 and 10 independent random phase screens. As it follows from [4,6,26], density inhomogeneities in the near-wall turbulent supersonic flow are characterized by anisotropy in the directions longitudinal and transverse to the flow. In the longitudinal direction they are much greater than in the transverse one.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Phase Screens Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%