2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0885715614001067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Li4Ti5O12 anode during charge-discharge cycling

Abstract: The structural evolution of the "zero-strain" Li4Ti5O12 anode within a functioning Li-ion battery during charge-discharge cycling was studied using in situ neutron powder-diffraction, allowing correlation of the anode structure to the measured charge-discharge profile. While the overall lattice response controls the "zero-strain" property, the oxygen atom is the only variable in the atomic structure and responds to the oxidation state of the titanium, resulting in distortion of the TiO6 octahedron and contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the first battery charge from OCV to 2.5 V vs LTO, the LTO 222 reflection intensity remained nearly unchanged while its position shifted to lower 2θ, indicating expansion. This response was followed by a monotonic increase in the reflection intensity alongside a shift in position to higher 2θ, indicating contraction, which continued until the end of lithiation (Figure a), consistent with Li + diffusion between the 8 a and 16 c sites occurring via the 32 e site, as previously observed. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…During the first battery charge from OCV to 2.5 V vs LTO, the LTO 222 reflection intensity remained nearly unchanged while its position shifted to lower 2θ, indicating expansion. This response was followed by a monotonic increase in the reflection intensity alongside a shift in position to higher 2θ, indicating contraction, which continued until the end of lithiation (Figure a), consistent with Li + diffusion between the 8 a and 16 c sites occurring via the 32 e site, as previously observed. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the literature, particularly if we consider electrochemically prepared Li 4+ x Ti 5 O 12 , there is ongoing discussion about the question whether a solid-solution is formed during Li insertion or a so-called two-phase system is generated. ,,, The latter means the formation of Li rich rock-salt type regions (Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 ) embedded or present in the grain boundary regions in Li poor spinel-type Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 . If we remember that Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 is a rather poor ionic (and electronic) conductor, the presence of better conducting and sufficiently large regions of Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 within a sample of the overall composition Li 4.1 Ti 5 O 12 should result in a 6 Li MAS NMR spectrum resembling that of Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 with a broad 8a NMR line and a narrower NMR line with a much smaller area fraction representing the Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 phase. , We have to keep in mind that the maximum Li ion diffusivity is found at x = 0.3... x = 1.0 while for larger values of x (e.g., x = 2) ion dynamics slows down once again. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the asassembled battery (Figure 6a), the LTO 222 reflection exhibits the largest change of 0.04(2)°, and revealing an initial shift to smaller angles as a consequence of lithium occupation at the 32e site during initial lithiation as shown previously. 9,33,34 In terms of LTO structure, the overall change in the positional parameter (x = y = z) of the oxygen atom is the same between the as-assembled and cycled batteries (Figure S5) As the latter lattice is only slightly smaller than the former, 36,37 the separation of these phases (< 0.04°) is not possible at the resolution of the data (FWHM ~ 0.8°). Therefore, the LTO phase transition is modelled as a single-phase (solid-solution reaction) after Wagemaker et al, 38 the details of which are presented in Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…By comparison, there is a relatively-large change in intensity of this reflection, consistent with the changing population of lithium at the 16c crystallographic site. 33,34 The structural behaviour of the positive electrode are captured in the NPD data by changes in the LNMO 222 reflection intensity and position, with this analysis being complicated by its overlap with the Al 111 reflection. Both the intensity and position of the LNMO 222 reflection change significantly during the NPD experiment for both batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%