1994
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01042-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the gene for human uracil—DNA glycosylase and analysis of the promoter function

Abstract: The gene for human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) contains 4 exons and has an approximate size of 13 kb. The promoter is very GC rich and lacks a TATA box. Nested deletions of the promoter demonstrated that two SP1 elements and a putative c-MYC element proximal to the transcription initiation region were sufficient to support some 27% of the promoter activity, while a clone that in addition contained the elements E2F/SPI/CCAAT increased expression to almost 90% of the full-length construct. A region upstream of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gene encoding the major human UDG, UNG, is transcribed predominantly late in the G 1 -phase, resulting in a 2-3-fold increase in UDG activity early in the S-phase (8). The cell cycle regulation is consistent with the presence of several putative regulatory elements detected in the UNG gene (9), including a putative element for binding of replication protein A (RPA) (10) reported previously in DNA repair genes in yeast (11). RPA is a trimeric protein required for initiation of DNA replication (12,13), in the initial steps of nucleotide excision repair in physical interaction with XPA (14), as well as in recombination repair (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gene encoding the major human UDG, UNG, is transcribed predominantly late in the G 1 -phase, resulting in a 2-3-fold increase in UDG activity early in the S-phase (8). The cell cycle regulation is consistent with the presence of several putative regulatory elements detected in the UNG gene (9), including a putative element for binding of replication protein A (RPA) (10) reported previously in DNA repair genes in yeast (11). RPA is a trimeric protein required for initiation of DNA replication (12,13), in the initial steps of nucleotide excision repair in physical interaction with XPA (14), as well as in recombination repair (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Previously, RPA has been shown to be involved in the damage recognition step of nucleotide excision repair (14), in recombination repair (15), and in replication (13), but a possible involvement in base excision repair has not been reported, except for a possible role of RPA as a transcription factor in the regulation of expression of DNA repair genes (11). A putative element for binding of RPA is located in an inhibitory region of the UNG promoter (9,10). In nucleotide excision repair, XPA interacts with both RPA2 and RPA1, but whereas RPA1 is essential for cell survival after UV light exposure, RPA2 has a more modest although significant effect (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UDG fold and residue function mapped onto the structure‐based alignment of UDG sequences (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers in parentheses) are from: (1) Homo sapiens (Haug et al ., 1994) (1296803); (2) Mus musculus (Svendsen et al ., 1997) (1762318); (3) E.coli (Varshney et al ., 1988) (148149); (4) human herpesvirus 1 (HSV‐1) (McGeoch et al ., 1988) (221724); (5) human cytomegalovirus (Chee et al ., 1990) (1780896); and (6) vaccinia virus (Goebel et al ., 1990) (137597). Secondary structure assignments, indicated above the sequence alignment, refer to the current co‐crystal structures of human UDG in complexes with DNA, and do not include the two small β‐strands (Mol et al ., 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutational studies have indicated that the c-Myc element is a positive regulator of UDG expression, whereas the E2F element (and overexpression of E2F) regulates UDG expression negatively. In addition, Sp1 elements are present in both the P A and the P B promoters, and are required for effective expression ( [80] ; T. Haug, P. A. Aas, F. Skorpen, V. Malm, C. Skjeldbred and H. E. Krokan, unpublished work). The nuclear and mitochondrial forms of UDG are probably not equally regulated, since their promoters (P A and P B ) are structurally different.…”
Section: Regulation Of Udg Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%