No abstract

Repair of DNA damage is essential for maintaining genome integrity, and repair deficiencies in mammals are associated with cancer, neurological disease and developmental defects. Alkylation damage in DNA is repaired by at least three different mechanisms, including damage reversal by oxidative demethylation of 1-methyladenine and 3-methylcytosine by Escherichia coli AlkB. By contrast, little is known about consequences and cellular handling of alkylation damage to RNA. Here we show that two human AlkB homologues, hABH2 and hABH3, also are oxidative DNA demethylases and that AlkB and hABH3, but not hABH2, also repair RNA. Whereas AlkB and hABH3 prefer single-stranded nucleic acids, hABH2 acts more efficiently on double-stranded DNA. In addition, AlkB and hABH3 expressed in E. coli reactivate methylated RNA bacteriophage MS2 in vivo, illustrating the biological relevance of this repair activity and establishing RNA repair as a potentially important defence mechanism in living cells. The different catalytic properties and the different subnuclear localization patterns shown by the human homologues indicate that hABH2 and hABH3 have distinct roles in the cellular response to alkylation damage.

We carried out a genome-wide association study of lung cancer (3,259 cases and 4,159 controls), followed by replication in 2,899 cases and 5,573 controls. Two uncorrelated disease markers at 5p15.33, rs402710 and rs2736100 were detected by the genome-wide data (P = 2 × 10 -7 and P = 4 × 10 -6 ) and replicated by the independent study series (P = 7 × 10 -5 and P = 0.016). The susceptibility region contains two genes, TERT and CLPTM1L, suggesting that one or both may have a role in lung cancer etiology.We and others have recently reported a susceptibility locus for lung cancer in gene region 15q25, an area that includes a cluster of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genes [1][2][3] . In order to identify further susceptibility gene loci, we genotyped an additional 1,291 cases and 1,561 controls from three further studies (Toronto case-control study,

hUNG2 and hSMUG1 are the only known glycosylases that may remove uracil from both double-and singlestranded DNA in nuclear chromatin, but their relative contribution to base excision repair remains elusive. The present study demonstrates that both enzymes are strongly stimulated by physiological concentrations of Mg 2؉, at which the activity of hUNG2 is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than of hSMUG1. Moreover, Mg 2؉ increases the preference of hUNG2 toward uracil in ssDNA nearly 40-fold. APE1 has a strong stimulatory effect on hSMUG1 against dsU, apparently because of enhanced dissociation of hSMUG1 from AP sites in dsDNA. hSMUG1 also has a broader substrate specificity than hUNG2, including 5-hydroxymethyluracil and 3,N 4 -ethenocytosine. hUNG2 is excluded from, whereas hSMUG1 accumulates in, nucleoli in living cells. In contrast, only hUNG2 accumulates in replication foci in the S-phase. hUNG2 in nuclear extracts initiates base excision repair of plasmids containing either U:A and U:G in vitro. Moreover, an additional but delayed repair of the U:G plasmid is observed that is not inhibited by neutralizing antibodies against hUNG2 or hSMUG1. We propose a model in which hUNG2 is responsible for both prereplicative removal of deaminated cytosine and postreplicative removal of misincorporated uracil at the replication fork. We also provide evidence that hUNG2 is the major enzyme for removal of deaminated cytosine outside of replication foci, with hSMUG1 acting as a broad specificity backup.Uracil in DNA can be introduced via two mechanisms, deamination of cytosine and misincorporation of dUMP during replication. Deamination of cytosine has been calculated from measured deamination rates to occur at a rate of 100 -500 per human cell/day (1, 2) to yield mutagenic U:G mispairs. Uracil may also appear as a consequence of misincorporation of dUMP instead of dTMP during replication, resulting in a U:A base pair. The latter is not miscoding, but may produce cytotoxic and mutagenic AP site intermediates during repair. In organisms containing 5-methylcytosine in their genomes, deamination of 5-methylcytosine furthermore leads to T:G mismatches. All living organisms express uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDGs) 1 that prevent cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of the above lesions. UDGs remove uracil (and sometimes other damaged bases or thymine) from the deoxyribose and thus initiate a multistep base excision repair (BER) pathway, eventually restoring the correct DNA sequence. After removal of uracil by an UDG and cleavage of the resulting abasic site by AP endonuclease (APE1/APE2), the BER pathway splits into two branches (reviewed in Ref.3). The presumed major track is the shortpatch pathway. It uses the 5Ј-deoxyribophosphodiesterase activity of DNA polymerase ␤ to cleave 3Ј of the abasic site, thus releasing deoxyribose-5-phosphate. Then pol ␤ inserts C or T, depending on the template base. Finally, DNA ligase III seals the nick, perhaps aided by the scaffold protein XRCC1. The alternative long-patch pathway largely uses replicatio...

Three genetic loci for lung cancer risk have been identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but inherited susceptibility to specific histologic types of lung cancer is not well established. We conducted a GWAS of lung cancer and its major histologic types, genotyping 515,922 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 5739 lung cancer cases and 5848 controls from one population-based case-control study and three cohort studies. Results were combined with summary data from ten additional studies, for a total of 13,300 cases and 19,666 controls of European descent. Four studies also provided histology data for replication, resulting in 3333 adenocarcinomas (AD), 2589 squamous cell carcinomas (SQ), and 1418 small cell carcinomas (SC). In analyses by histology, rs2736100 (TERT), on chromosome 5p15.33, was associated with risk of adenocarcinoma (odds ratio [OR]=1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.13-1.33, p=3.02x10(-7)), but not with other histologic types (OR=1.01, p=0.84 and OR=1.00, p=0.93 for SQ and SC, respectively). This finding was confirmed in each replication study and overall meta-analysis (OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.17-1.31, p=3.74x10(-14) for AD; OR=0.99, p=0.69 and OR=0.97, p=0.48 for SQ and SC, respectively). Other previously reported association signals on 15q25 and 6p21 were also refined, but no additional loci reached genome-wide significance. In conclusion, a lung cancer GWAS identified a distinct hereditary contribution to adenocarcinoma.