2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of non-stoichiometric Sr–Bi–Nb–O thin films grown by PLD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the example of SBN, the Bi under-stoichiometry results, when the film is epitaxially grown on a well-matched substrate like (100)SrTiO 3 , in the epitaxial intergrowth of two phases corresponding to the terms m ¼ 2 and m ¼ 3 in the Aurivillius general formula, as clearly evidenced by X-ray diffraction analysis and modeling [101], RBS channeling measurements and XPD [102] as well as direct observation by transmission electron microscopy on cross sections [103]. Indeed, the m ¼ 3 term does not exists in the bulk, as mentioned above, and is stabilized only when sandwiched between two m ¼ 2 layers.…”
Section: Control Of Compositionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the example of SBN, the Bi under-stoichiometry results, when the film is epitaxially grown on a well-matched substrate like (100)SrTiO 3 , in the epitaxial intergrowth of two phases corresponding to the terms m ¼ 2 and m ¼ 3 in the Aurivillius general formula, as clearly evidenced by X-ray diffraction analysis and modeling [101], RBS channeling measurements and XPD [102] as well as direct observation by transmission electron microscopy on cross sections [103]. Indeed, the m ¼ 3 term does not exists in the bulk, as mentioned above, and is stabilized only when sandwiched between two m ¼ 2 layers.…”
Section: Control Of Compositionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As mentioned above, quite a few observations bear witness to a nonrandom disorder of the structure. In addition, the density of the SFs is not low in a number of cases (Duclè re et al, 2005;Guilmeau et al, 2005). The assumption of a constant value of the c lattice parameter should be taken with caution, because various authors report different c values for the same material (Brazdeikis et al, 1995;Budin et al, 1993;Michel et al, 1987;Onoda et al, 1988;Rubin et al, 1994;Tarascon et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made to develop an approach that would allow a characterization of the type and density of SFs using X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques (Boulle et al, 2001;Brazdeikis et al, 1995;Duclè re et al, 2005;Onoda et al, 1988;Tarascon et al, 1988;Ranno et al, 1993;Rud' & Ustinov, 1996;Vailionis et al, 1995). These approaches were grounded on the following main assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stacking faults are widely known to have considerable effect on the diffraction patterns. Contrary to where each main (strongest) diffraction peak is in the same position as the corresponded Bragg reflection of the basic structure [1], the occurrence of the stacking faults affects diffraction-peak positions of the basic structure [5][6][7][8][9]. It is true for an ordered as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%