2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00601-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Cry2Aa Suggests an Unexpected Receptor Binding Epitope

Abstract: The crystal structure of Cry2Aa reported here, together with chimeric-scanning and domain-swapping mutagenesis, defines the putative receptor binding epitope on the toxin and so may allow for alteration of specificity to combat resistance or to minimize collateral effects on nontarget species. The putative receptor binding epitope of Cry2Aa identified in this study differs from that inferred from previous structural studies of other Cry toxins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
187
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
187
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, altered and/or slower protoxin processing has been associated with reduced susceptibility and resistance in Lepidoptera (Zalunin et al, 2015), supporting that both appropriate processing and kinetics of toxin core production may have an effect on specificity. Although the smaller toxins such as Cry2 and Cry3 do not undergo extensive processing at the C-terminus, they are cleaved at the Nterminus and there is evidence that this cleavage is required for toxicity and could potentially determine specificity Morse et al, 2001). An additional N-terminal cleavage is proposed to occur as part of the mechanism of action of some toxins, and mutants where toxins have been pre-cleaved at this site show an altered specificity in that they can partially overcome a resistant phenotype .…”
Section: Specificity Level Iii: Toxin Processing and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, altered and/or slower protoxin processing has been associated with reduced susceptibility and resistance in Lepidoptera (Zalunin et al, 2015), supporting that both appropriate processing and kinetics of toxin core production may have an effect on specificity. Although the smaller toxins such as Cry2 and Cry3 do not undergo extensive processing at the C-terminus, they are cleaved at the Nterminus and there is evidence that this cleavage is required for toxicity and could potentially determine specificity Morse et al, 2001). An additional N-terminal cleavage is proposed to occur as part of the mechanism of action of some toxins, and mutants where toxins have been pre-cleaved at this site show an altered specificity in that they can partially overcome a resistant phenotype .…”
Section: Specificity Level Iii: Toxin Processing and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, the three-dimensional structures of Bt Cry toxins have been determined by X-ray crystallography in almost all the major specificity classes, including the lepidoteran-specific Cry1Aa (PDB code: 1CIY) (Grochulski JMB 1995) [15], the lepidopteran/dipteran-dual specific Cry2Aa (PDB code: 1I5P) (Morse Structure 2001) [16], the coleopteran-specific Cry3Aa (PDB code: 1DLC) (Li Nature 1991) [17] and Cry3Bb (PDB code: 1JI6) (Galitsky ACD 2001) [18], the dipteran-specific Cry4Aa (PDB code: 2C9K) (Boonserm J Bacteriol 2006) [19] and Cry4Ba (PDB code: 1W99) (Boonserm JMB 2005) [20], and more recently another coleopteran-specific Cry8Ea (PDB code: 3EB7) (Guo JSB 2009) [21]. Undoubtedly, all these known structures have been a valuable contribution to the Bt research area since they have been providing a greater understanding for the structural basis of their insect specificity and gut epithelial cell lysis.…”
Section: Structural Description Of the Three-domain Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structures of several trypsin-activated Cry proteins (Cry1Aa, Cry3Aa, Cry3Bb and Cry2Aa) have been elucidated [6][7][8][9], revealing a similar three-domain structure. The N-terminal domain I consists of seven α-helices, and is thought to be responsible for toxin insertion into the cell membrane, leading to pore formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%