1980
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740880006796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of bis(1,10-phenanthroline)platinum(II) dichloride trihydrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important interatomic distances and angles are given in Table and are similar to those published for complex 2(CF 3 SO 3 ) . The Ru–P and Ru–N bond lengths are somewhat shorter in 2F 2 (Ru–P1 = 2.341(2) Å, Ru1–P2 = 2.332 (15) Å; Ru–N range: 2.092(4) Å‐2.104(4) Å) than in 2CF 3 SO 3 (Ru–P: 2.342(18) Å, 2.353(18) Å; Ru–N range: 2.105(5) Å ‐ 2.110(5) Å), and agree with previously reported bis(bipyridine)‐bis(phosphine)ruthenium complexes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most important interatomic distances and angles are given in Table and are similar to those published for complex 2(CF 3 SO 3 ) . The Ru–P and Ru–N bond lengths are somewhat shorter in 2F 2 (Ru–P1 = 2.341(2) Å, Ru1–P2 = 2.332 (15) Å; Ru–N range: 2.092(4) Å‐2.104(4) Å) than in 2CF 3 SO 3 (Ru–P: 2.342(18) Å, 2.353(18) Å; Ru–N range: 2.105(5) Å ‐ 2.110(5) Å), and agree with previously reported bis(bipyridine)‐bis(phosphine)ruthenium complexes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[14] The Ru-P and Ru-N bond lengths are somewhat shorter in 2F 2 (Ru-P1 = 2.341(2) Å, Ru1-P2 = 2.332 (15) Å; Ru-N range: 2.092(4) Å-2.104(4) Å) than in 2CF 3 SO 3 (Ru-P: 2.342(18) Å, 2.353(18) Å; Ru-N range: 2.105(5) Å -2.110(5) Å), and agree with previously reported bis(bipyridine)-bis(phosphine)ruthenium complexes. [20] Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2F 2 .…”
Section: Crystal Structure Of 2fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,7,17] A similar conformation has also been found in the phenanthroline-substituted cations [Pd(3-Rphen) 2 ] 2+ (α = 18.8 and 23.2°, for R = iPr and nBu, respectively), [8] and in the platinum(ii) complex [Pt(phen) 2 ][Cl] 2 · 3H 2 O (α = 20.9°). [18] On the other hand, in the case of [Pd(phen) 2 ][PF 6 ] 2 , the repulsive interactions are partly alleviated by a bending on opposite sides of the π 1 , π 2 and π 1 Ј, π 2 Ј planes (dihedral angles β, βЈ) giving rise to a step geometry (α = 0°, β = βЈ = 16.2°), with the five-membered rings in an envelope conformation. [4] This deformation is accompanied by a tilting, towards the same side, of the π 3 , π 4 planes (dihedral angle γ = 13.4°) so that each phen ligand exhibits a bow conformation, and the cation acquires an overall bow-step shape.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S4, ESI †). 1 18 and telomeric G-quadruplex. 11 Complex 1 contains a square p-aromatic surface with the cation located in the center of the structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%