2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-015-0517-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Core–Shell Type Colloid Nanoparticle in Aqueous Solution Studied by XPS from a Liquid Microjet

Abstract: With the developments of near ambient pressure photoemission and the liquid microjet, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements at the liquidnanoparticle interface are now possible. This significant advance allows soft matter physicists working in the field of colloid nanoscience the opportunity to perform surface science experiments long deemed impossible. Here we use XPS in conjunction with a liquid microjet to study the electronic and geometric structures of a core-shell type nanoparticle, Al x O … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[159] Agood strategy to enhancethe surface concentration of charged nanoparticles is to add ah ydrophobic ligand,w hich acts as as urfactant allowing the detection of small concentrations. [160] From 2011o nwards, by using liquid microjets of the suspensions, the space distribution of tin oxide (SnO 2 )n anoparticles was characterized, [162] surfacec harging of titania nanoparticles was detected, [163] the surface potentiala tt he solid/liquid interface was measured, [164] Al x O y @SiO 2 core-shell nanoparticles were successfully characterized( surface charging at acidic pH and qualitative depth profile) [165] and an evaluation of the thickness of the electrical double layer as af unction of electrolyte concentration was provided. [166] These examples demonstrate the versatility and strong potentiality of at echnique that gives important insights into the currently poorly understood processes that occur during wet-chemistry synthesis.…”
Section: I) Analysis Of Liquid/nanoparticle Interface Using Liquid MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[159] Agood strategy to enhancethe surface concentration of charged nanoparticles is to add ah ydrophobic ligand,w hich acts as as urfactant allowing the detection of small concentrations. [160] From 2011o nwards, by using liquid microjets of the suspensions, the space distribution of tin oxide (SnO 2 )n anoparticles was characterized, [162] surfacec harging of titania nanoparticles was detected, [163] the surface potentiala tt he solid/liquid interface was measured, [164] Al x O y @SiO 2 core-shell nanoparticles were successfully characterized( surface charging at acidic pH and qualitative depth profile) [165] and an evaluation of the thickness of the electrical double layer as af unction of electrolyte concentration was provided. [166] These examples demonstrate the versatility and strong potentiality of at echnique that gives important insights into the currently poorly understood processes that occur during wet-chemistry synthesis.…”
Section: I) Analysis Of Liquid/nanoparticle Interface Using Liquid MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches have been reported in the literature for studying the solid/liquid interface of nanoparticles using XPS. The first utilizes a microjet setup. In this method, the X-ray beam irradiates a microjet flow (∼50 μm in diameter) containing the suspended nanoparticles. The photoelectrons generated from the nanoparticles travel through the liquid layers and are collected by an energy analyzer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoelectrons generated from the nanoparticles travel through the liquid layers and are collected by an energy analyzer. Valuable insights about the interface between nanoparticles and liquid have been obtained using this technique by a few groups. However, the pressure around the microjet in the analyzer chamber during the experiment is roughly 10 –4 to 10 –2 Torr, requiring the use of a differentially pumped energy analyzer instead of a common HV energy analyzer. Second, to prevent clogging of the jet nozzle (<50 μm), a relatively low concentration and small size of nanoparticles are suggested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, characterisation of suspended nanoparticles with NAP-XPS has so far only been performed with liquid microjet, which was first done on SiO 2based nanoparticles in aqueous solution [12,13]. Core-shell nanoparticles have also been characterised and qualitatively depth profiled by using a liquid microjet [14]. The authors emphasise that a quantitative depth profiling is dependent on better understanding of the inelastic mean free path in water and the nanoparticle distribution at the air-water interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%