1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, Institutions, Power, and Ideology: New Directions Within Symbolic Interactionism

Abstract: Responding to a fusillade of criticism in the 1970s, interactionists made numerous studies to accentuate the structural elements of constraint. This reconstruction of symbolic interactionism (SI) has led to some convergences with the British School of Cultural Studies (BSCS). A selected group of SI studies are reviewed under the rubrics of negotiated order, master institutions, structural categories of gender and race, and power and ideology. Throughout, the article argues that SI's concern with institutions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests we revisit the suggestion that symbolic interactionist analyses ignore power (Musolf, 1992). When we examine power's multiple modalities, the contribution of symbolic interactionism becomes clearer.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests we revisit the suggestion that symbolic interactionist analyses ignore power (Musolf, 1992). When we examine power's multiple modalities, the contribution of symbolic interactionism becomes clearer.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interactionist tradition has attended somewhat to the constituting role of structure(Maines 1977), some argue that this has been at most a subsidiary focus or that the perspective has given inadequate attention to the centrality of domination in group life(Athens 2009;Musolf 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SI as a research programme is multifaceted and still evolving (Fine, 1993;Hallett et al, 2010;Musolf, 1992;Stryker, 2008). In its early phase, Mead (1934), Blumer (1969 and Hughes (1951) focused on the constitutive role of individuals and rebelled against an 'un-peopled' view of institutions and society (Hallett et al, 2010: 488).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%