2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(99)00018-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-borne noise reduction in a truck cab interior using numerical techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results can be explained by the fact that truck drivers are usually confined to their cabin for extensive periods [14] and therefore may not tolerate extra sounds. In fact, much research has been conducted on the cancellation of noise in the cabin [15][16][17][18]. Truck drivers have a risk of hearing loss due to the noise in the working environment [19].…”
Section: Main Findings and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results can be explained by the fact that truck drivers are usually confined to their cabin for extensive periods [14] and therefore may not tolerate extra sounds. In fact, much research has been conducted on the cancellation of noise in the cabin [15][16][17][18]. Truck drivers have a risk of hearing loss due to the noise in the working environment [19].…”
Section: Main Findings and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, for an internal problem a FEM/FEM model is often quicker. For external unbounded problems BEM/FEM comes to its full right, since boundary elements satisfy the Sommerfeld radiation condition and therefore can handle Consequently, even if the exclusive usage of FEM to work out acoustic problems is still popular [2][3][4], nowadays, the most efficient approach to study the car vibroacoustic problems is based on the coupled usage of Finite Element Method (FEM) for vibration analysis and Boundary Element Method for acoustic analysis [5][6][7][8][9]. The possibility offered by BEM to reduce the dimensionality of the meshing domain is highly appreciated when considering the complex geometry of the car components; moreover, as previously said, BEM performs better for exterior problems (e.g., radiation from a component in an infinite domain).…”
Section: Bem/fem or Fem/femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method (FEM) can be used to perform the structural vibration analysis as well as acoustic analysis. But it will consume a lot of computing time, whereas the BEM is efficient and timesaving in the field of acoustic analysis [4]. Hence, FEM and BEM are associated with the analysis in this study.…”
Section: Acoustic Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%