2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-based prediction of MHC–peptide association: Algorithm comparison and application to cancer vaccine design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20) computed from low-or high-resolution models of peptide-MHC complexes. Notably, such high-resolution features are often integrated with experimental binding data and binding predictions are made using specifically trained machine-learning algorithms (15,18,20), hinting at the challenges faced by high-resolution modeling.Here we report the direct use of atomically detailed molecular modeling to map peptide binding landscapes for a diverse collection of HLA-A and HLA-B proteins. For our purposes, a complete description of a peptide binding landscape would consist of the binding affinities of the target protein for all possible peptides, and three-dimensional cocomplex structures for all highaffinity binding peptides (peptide structure, as well as sequence, being critical for processes such as recognition by T cells).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20) computed from low-or high-resolution models of peptide-MHC complexes. Notably, such high-resolution features are often integrated with experimental binding data and binding predictions are made using specifically trained machine-learning algorithms (15,18,20), hinting at the challenges faced by high-resolution modeling.Here we report the direct use of atomically detailed molecular modeling to map peptide binding landscapes for a diverse collection of HLA-A and HLA-B proteins. For our purposes, a complete description of a peptide binding landscape would consist of the binding affinities of the target protein for all possible peptides, and three-dimensional cocomplex structures for all highaffinity binding peptides (peptide structure, as well as sequence, being critical for processes such as recognition by T cells).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, 18, and 19; and intermolecular contacts, ref. 20) computed from low-or high-resolution models of peptide-MHC complexes. Notably, such high-resolution features are often integrated with experimental binding data and binding predictions are made using specifically trained machine-learning algorithms (15,18,20), hinting at the challenges faced by high-resolution modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a large amount of data for crystal structures of HLA–peptide complexes has been accumulated, allowing bioinformaticians to predict molecular binding simulations. ( 20,21 ) However, despite biophysical and biochemical analysis of HLA complexes, accurate prediction of antigen peptide binding to HLA molecule is still difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides that can bind to MHC on the tumour cell surface have potential to initiate a host immune response against the tumour. Schiewe and Haworth 101 developed an algorithm P e SSI (peptide–MHC prediction of structure through solvated interfaces) for flexible structure prediction of peptide binding to the MHC molecule. They used CT antigens (Cancer Testis), KU‐CT‐1, that have the potential to bind HLA‐A2.…”
Section: Various Tools and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%