2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018165108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-scale characterization of peptide-MHC binding landscapes with structural simulations

Abstract: Class I major histocompatibility complex proteins play a critical role in the adaptive immune system by binding to peptides derived from cytosolic proteins and presenting them on the cell surface for surveillance by T cells. The varied peptide binding specificity of these highly polymorphic molecules has important consequences for vaccine design, transplantation, autoimmunity, and cancer development. Here, we describe a molecular modeling study of MHC-peptide interactions that integrates sampling techniques fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequence-specific binding of peptides to the MHC molecule is highly dependent on the interactions of the peptide side chains at particular positions (“anchors”) along the length of the peptide with chemical moieties defined by the polymorphic residues that constitute the MHC binding pocket (22–24); hence, predictive calculations are sequence-dependent (25). Furthermore, analysis of these critical MHC-binding positions and residues over a wide range of MHC alleles shows that only a few positions of the peptide are anchor positions and only a few amino acids at the anchor positions of the peptide contribute to binding in a positive manner (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence-specific binding of peptides to the MHC molecule is highly dependent on the interactions of the peptide side chains at particular positions (“anchors”) along the length of the peptide with chemical moieties defined by the polymorphic residues that constitute the MHC binding pocket (22–24); hence, predictive calculations are sequence-dependent (25). Furthermore, analysis of these critical MHC-binding positions and residues over a wide range of MHC alleles shows that only a few positions of the peptide are anchor positions and only a few amino acids at the anchor positions of the peptide contribute to binding in a positive manner (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our epitope prediction method was trained on large-scale peptide-binding affinity data, although predictions can be made using other sources. When experimental binding constants are not available, MHC-peptide structure simulations have shown promise in calculating accurate sequence specificities based on MHC-peptide energetics (31). As improvements in energy functions lead to improvement in the prediction of the effects of mutations on stability and function and high-throughput experimental MHC-peptide-binding data become increasingly available, computational protein design will play an increasingly prominent role in development of next generation protein therapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 However, including such information infers longer computation times and provides only modest improvement of prediction accuracy. 40 Most algorithms predict the affinity of peptide binding to MHC molecules, which may not correlate well with their immunogenicity, i.e., ability to elicit T cell immunity, which has been reported to correlate better with pMHC complex stability. 41 Moreover, cancer cells may not present predicted peptides, e.g.…”
Section: Cancer Mhc I Ligand Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%