2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10930-020-09953-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-Based Identification of Potential Drugs Against FmtA of Staphylococcus aureus: Virtual Screening, Molecular Dynamics, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein-ligand binding energies of the FmtA conf -WTA and vFmtA conf -WTA complexes were determined by MM-GBSA, as done by Dalal et al , Binding free energy calculations were performed from the averages of 2000 snapshots retrieved every 10 ps from the last 20 ns (80–100 ns) of the MD simulation. This method has been utilized as a reliable tool for the determination of the binding free energy (Δ G mmgbsa ) using the following equation: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein-ligand binding energies of the FmtA conf -WTA and vFmtA conf -WTA complexes were determined by MM-GBSA, as done by Dalal et al , Binding free energy calculations were performed from the averages of 2000 snapshots retrieved every 10 ps from the last 20 ns (80–100 ns) of the MD simulation. This method has been utilized as a reliable tool for the determination of the binding free energy (Δ G mmgbsa ) using the following equation: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystal structure of FmtA (PDB ID: 5ZH8) was considered as a protein receptor to screen potential compounds . The virtual screening of FmtA against 1930 drugs of e-LEA3D: Cheminformatics Tools and Database () was performed utilizing AutoDock Vina in PyRx, as done by Dalal et al The best drug molecules with higher binding energies were re-docked by utilizing HADDOCK () and AutoDockTools. , The molecular grid in virtual screening and molecular docking was set around the active site residues (Ser127, Lys130, Tyr211, and Asp213) of FmtA. The generated docking conformations were evaluated, and figures were made in Maestro and PyMOL. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics for FmtA–Native and FmtA–inhibitor(s) complexes were carried out using GROMACS software package, as performed by Dalal et al The protein coordinates and topology files were created utilizing the GROMOS96 43a1 force field, and the protonation states were updated at pH 7.2 by the H ++ server. ,− The ligands (gemifloxacin, paromomycin, streptomycin, and tobramycin) were prepared using PRODRG (), and the charges were corrected by the 6-311G (d,p) basis set of DFT/B3LYP in Gaussian. The systems were neutralized by substituting the counterions (Cl – ) and solvated in triclinic boxes (Table S1). The systems were equilibrated for 1 ns and minimized for 50,000 steps, as done by Dalal et al The molecular dynamics simulation was run for 100 ns for all the systems, and the files were updated every 10 ps to evaluate the root-mean-square fluctuations (RMSF), root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), hydrogen-bond numbers, radius of gyration (Rg), and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA). , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various frontier molecular orbitals like highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) as well the optimized geometry for (1–5) were determined in gaseous and water to understand the localization of the electron density to known about nucleophilic and electrophilic sites ( Fig. 1 ) [ [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Computational Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%