2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Magnetic Properties of a Nanosized Iron-Doped Bismuth Titanate Pyrochlore

Abstract: The nanosized (50–70 nm) pyrochlore Bi1.5Fe0.5Ti2O7−δ was prepared by a coprecipitation technique. Characterization of Bi1.5Fe0.5Ti2O7−δ was carried out by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Raman spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and magnetic susceptibility measurements. The study of Fe doping in Bi2Ti2O7 was performed by means of density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The nanosized Bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While compared with other Bi titanate-based pyrochlores, the oxygen tracer diffusion coefficient values of Y-doped Bi titanate are slightly lower than those for Sc-doped Bi titanate and significantly lower than those for Mg- and Zn-doped Bi titanates ( Figure 8 , curves 4–6) previously studied by authors [ 18 , 24 ]. This is probably due to the difference in cation size and charge as well as A-site stoichiometry (the samples from works [ 20 , 26 ] are A-site deficient) and, hence, oxygen vacancy content and space in the lattice for oxygen migration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While compared with other Bi titanate-based pyrochlores, the oxygen tracer diffusion coefficient values of Y-doped Bi titanate are slightly lower than those for Sc-doped Bi titanate and significantly lower than those for Mg- and Zn-doped Bi titanates ( Figure 8 , curves 4–6) previously studied by authors [ 18 , 24 ]. This is probably due to the difference in cation size and charge as well as A-site stoichiometry (the samples from works [ 20 , 26 ] are A-site deficient) and, hence, oxygen vacancy content and space in the lattice for oxygen migration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The isotope exchange was carried out in He + 1% C 18 O 2 + 1% Ar flow (25 mL min −1 ) while heating from 50 to 800 • C with a constant ramp of 5 • C min −1 . 18 O atomic fraction (α) and C 16 O 18 O atomic fraction (f 16-18 ) responses were analyzed in order to estimate isotope exchange kinetic parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations