2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Magnetic Properties of Pristine and Fe-Doped Micro- and Nanographenes

Abstract: We report on magnetic susceptibility, NMR, and EPR measurements of pristine and Fe-doped micro- and nanosized graphenes (LGr and NGr), prepared by a unique microwave enabled technique from graphite particles. Significant orbital diamagnetism in the studied compounds (∼70% of that of bulk graphite) is revealed. At T < 30 K, a weak paramagnetism due to edge π-electronic spin states is observed. Reduction on the lateral size of the graphene sheets results in the suppression of orbital diamagnetism and strengtheni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The J value of 2.41 higher than 0.5 is described in the literature [18], as a result of interactions between 4-5 spins (forming clusters). Similar values of J = 2, or with alternative fitting 5/2 were obtained by Panich et al for nanographites doped with iron [49]. Further, it is stated that the increased annealing temperature > 200 K destroys large clusters and leads to a decreased value of J (0.5 at 1000 K) [45].…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Goqdssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The J value of 2.41 higher than 0.5 is described in the literature [18], as a result of interactions between 4-5 spins (forming clusters). Similar values of J = 2, or with alternative fitting 5/2 were obtained by Panich et al for nanographites doped with iron [49]. Further, it is stated that the increased annealing temperature > 200 K destroys large clusters and leads to a decreased value of J (0.5 at 1000 K) [45].…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Goqdssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The very weak signal is identical to the cavity background. Therefore, the absence of Cu 2+ signal in this spectrum can be explained by the very strong Cu 2+ ‐Cu 2+ dipolar interaction, which increases the signal linewidth, making EPR detection difficult . This result is consistent with the Cu 2+ ‐Cu 2+ distances that range from 1.148 to 1.393 Angstroms as determined in crystalline state, by X‐ray diffraction …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Not unrelated to the present study, Lyon and coworkers [38] investigated electron spin resonance in a monolayer of graphene on a Si/SiO 2 substrate in which the g factor was 1.952 ± 0.002 and insensitive to charge carrier type, concentration and mobility. A recent study by Panich et al [39] attributed the EPR signal in graphenes as originating either from the π-electronic edge-localized spins interacting with molecular oxygen, or to some stable defects in graphene that are insensitive to the oxygen environment. In our present case, the obtained g factor value is more relevant to stable carbon radicals produced by defects in p-C/TiO 2 .…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%