2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2745330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and magnetic moments of mass-filtered deposited nanoparticles

Abstract: Mass-filtered 3d transition metal nanoparticles have been produced by means of an ultrahigh vacuum compatible arc cluster ion source. High resolution transmission electron microscopy images of individual Fe, Co, and FeCo alloy particles with diameters of about 12 nm reveal the crystalline structure of the nanoparticles. X-ray absorption spectroscopy confirms the purity of the particles after in situ deposition. Analysis of the x-ray magnetic circular dichroism reveals bulklike total magnetic moments in all cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising since theory treats a perfect monolayer, whereas the XMCD measurements have been performed on granular films. 53 and a significantly smaller one for 6-ML-thick FeCo films on Rh͑100͒ close to the equiatomic composition ͑1.8 B ͒. 7 An evident discrepancy between theory and XMCD data exists in the case of pure Fe for which we measured a strongly reduced effective spin moment of S eff = ͑1.2Ϯ 0.2͒ B vs 3.0 B found by theory.…”
Section: A Experiments Versus Theorymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This is surprising since theory treats a perfect monolayer, whereas the XMCD measurements have been performed on granular films. 53 and a significantly smaller one for 6-ML-thick FeCo films on Rh͑100͒ close to the equiatomic composition ͑1.8 B ͒. 7 An evident discrepancy between theory and XMCD data exists in the case of pure Fe for which we measured a strongly reduced effective spin moment of S eff = ͑1.2Ϯ 0.2͒ B vs 3.0 B found by theory.…”
Section: A Experiments Versus Theorymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For the present paper, the cluster source operation parameters as well as the mass-filter settings are held constant for all samples. This ensures similar growth, selection, and landing conditions in all experiments, with the kinetic energy of the particles prior to the impact on the substrate smaller than 0.1 eV/atom [44]. With these settings, the deposition takes place under so-called soft landing conditions, where no fragmentation of the particles or damage to the substrate is expected [46,47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wafers are annealed in the UHV RHEED system (base pressure: 5 × 10 −9 mbar) at a temperature of about 525 K until the pressure in the chamber recovers (after an initial increase) and the recorded RHEED pattern indicates a clean and flat SiO x surface. (iii) Finally, the nanoparticles are deposited onto the prepared substrates using an arc cluster ion source (ACIS), which is attached to the SPS [43][44][45]. For RHEED and X-PEEM investigations, all samples are transferred under UHV conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,8 The present monodispersed silver clusters were produced using an arc cluster ion source. 9 The subsequent mass separation of the desired cluster size was achieved by an electrostatic quadrupole deflector. As support material, a 3 ML ͑monolayer͒ thick amorphous alumina film prepared by atomic layer deposition on the top of a naturally oxidized silicon wafer was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%