Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2401-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Function of a Nonruminant Gut: A Porcine Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…our results, obtained both by culture-dependent and DGGE method did not show significant differences in LAB counts between litters from treated and untreated sows. The discrepancy could be appointed to the fact that lactobacilli normally inhabit distal part of small intestine; hence the analysis of ileal microbiota would be needed to assess the influence of probiotic treatment of sows on total lactobacilli diversity in the litters ( Tajima and Aminov, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…our results, obtained both by culture-dependent and DGGE method did not show significant differences in LAB counts between litters from treated and untreated sows. The discrepancy could be appointed to the fact that lactobacilli normally inhabit distal part of small intestine; hence the analysis of ileal microbiota would be needed to assess the influence of probiotic treatment of sows on total lactobacilli diversity in the litters ( Tajima and Aminov, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient requirements of wild animal species are largely unknown and how they are fed is based on a "model" species for which there is already an understanding of their nutritional needs. Often domestic models such as dogs (Bellanger et al, 2015), cats (Vester et al, 2010), swine (Tajima & Aminov, 2015), poultry (Wilkinson, Bradbury, Thomson, Bedford, & Cowieson, 2014), rat (Robbins, 2012), horse (Hagen et al, 2015;Johnson, 2014), rhesus macaque (O'Sullivan et al, 2013), duck (Robbins, 2012), mink (Diez-Leon & Mason, 2016, goat (Weiss, Schook, & Wolfe, 2014), and sheep (Gattiker et al, 2014) are used. Choice of model species will depend on phylogenetic relatedness, similarity in feeding ecology and digestive morphology and physiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together with the phylogenetic analysis, we are lacking a holistic understanding from global and host distribution of methanogens to their methanogenic actions. Other publications have also discussed the lack of overall methanogen knowledge, especially knowledge surrounding archaeal functions [123][124][125] . Archaea are a member of the gut microbiome alongside bacteria, fungi and viruses, and without understanding their distribution and functions, we will not understand how archaea influence the gut microbiome system and host health.…”
Section: Differential Methanobacteriales and Methanomassiliicoccales ...mentioning
confidence: 99%