2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and evolution of a European Parliament via a network and correlation analysis

Abstract: We present a study of the network of relationships among elected members of the Finnish parliament, based on a quantitative analysis of initiative co-signatures, and its evolution over 16 years. To understand the structure of the parliament, we constructed a statistically validated network of members, based on the similarity between the patterns of initiatives they signed. We looked for communities within the network and characterized them in terms of members' attributes, such as electoral district and party. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the Finnish parliament dataset (term 2011-2014), results reported in top-row panels of figure 6 show how the weighing destroys the cluster of party KESK, implying that this cluster is more due to the heterogeneity and consequent bias in the unweighted correlation estimator than to a real collaboration between MPs, while, at the same time, weighing preserves the cluster of party PS. This finding is in agreement with the general trend observed in [25], where the evolution of this network over four Finnish parliament terms is studied. In fact, during previous terms, MPs collaborated by district and by party both, with party being more characterizing in the opposition and district sub-clustering within the government.…”
Section: J Stat Mech (2019) 053404supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning the Finnish parliament dataset (term 2011-2014), results reported in top-row panels of figure 6 show how the weighing destroys the cluster of party KESK, implying that this cluster is more due to the heterogeneity and consequent bias in the unweighted correlation estimator than to a real collaboration between MPs, while, at the same time, weighing preserves the cluster of party PS. This finding is in agreement with the general trend observed in [25], where the evolution of this network over four Finnish parliament terms is studied. In fact, during previous terms, MPs collaborated by district and by party both, with party being more characterizing in the opposition and district sub-clustering within the government.…”
Section: J Stat Mech (2019) 053404supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Obviously, when going from Eq. (18) to Eq. (19), one needs first to remove all the values of w i q that are either 0, 1 or infinite.…”
Section: Weight-groups and Odds-ratios Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have explored the dynamics of legislative behavior using complex network and social network analysis [11][12][13][14]. Given that parliamentarians change in each legislative term, these analyses provide descriptions of local changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%