2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–activity relationships of novel non-competitive mGluR1 antagonists: A potential treatment for chronic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The natural consequence of competitive antagonists, the structural similarity to the endogenous agonist glutamate, is the difficulty in making highly subtype selective glutamate antagonists, with unsurprising side effects on mGluR5, group II or Group III mGluRs [25]. The identification of nonglutamate binding mGluR1 allosteric modulators, such as BAY36-7620 and Riluzole, improves the chances of identifying mGluR subtype selective molecules with better drug-like properties [29]. BAY36-7620 is a potent, non-competitive mGluR1 antagonist, and inhibits >60% of mGlu1a receptor constitutive activity without displacement of the [ 3 H]quisqualate binding from the glutamate-binding pocket [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural consequence of competitive antagonists, the structural similarity to the endogenous agonist glutamate, is the difficulty in making highly subtype selective glutamate antagonists, with unsurprising side effects on mGluR5, group II or Group III mGluRs [25]. The identification of nonglutamate binding mGluR1 allosteric modulators, such as BAY36-7620 and Riluzole, improves the chances of identifying mGluR subtype selective molecules with better drug-like properties [29]. BAY36-7620 is a potent, non-competitive mGluR1 antagonist, and inhibits >60% of mGlu1a receptor constitutive activity without displacement of the [ 3 H]quisqualate binding from the glutamate-binding pocket [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, several novel negative allosteric mGlu1 receptor modulators (Table 6) were described that in functional in vitro assays had high potencies with IC 50 values in the low nanomolar range: (3,4- (Lavreysen et al, 2004), 6-amino-N-cyclohexyl-N,3-dimethylthiazolo [3,2-a]benzimidazole-2-carboxamide hydrochloride (YM-298198) (Kohara et al, 2005) (Kohara et al, 2007), FTIDC (Suzuki et al, 2007a), 3-cyclohexyl-5-fluoro-6-methyl-7-(2-morpholin-4-ylethoxy)-4H-chromen-4-one (Fukuda et al, 2009) and compounds IX (Micheli et al, 2003) and X (Zheng et al, 2005) in Table 6. A number of additional negative allosteric mGlu1 receptor modulators (not shown in Table 6) have been described; their structures are given in the respective references (Mabire et al, 2005;Micheli et al, 2006;Di Fabio et al, 2007;Owen et al, 2007;Vanejevs et al, 2008;Sasikumar et al, 2009;Satoh et al, 2009). Some of these molecules showed good in vivo-activity, especially in models for chronic pain (see below).…”
Section: Allosteric Modulators Of the Mglu1 Receptor A Negative Allomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from anti-microbial activity, literature search showed that compounds 1, 5, 6, 13, and 15 were previously evaluated as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the management of depression [14]. Compound 32 was evaluated as a G-protein-coupled metabotropic receptor (mGluR1) antagonist for the treatment of chronic pain [15]. selectivity of such compounds toward mycobacteria.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from anti-microbial activity, literature search showed that compounds 1, 5, 6, 13, and 15 were previously evaluated as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the management of depression [14]. Compound 32 was evaluated as a G-protein-coupled metabotropic receptor (mGluR1) antagonist for the treatment of chronic pain [15]. Regarding antimycobacterial activity against Mtb H37Ra, we found that compounds with methylene bridge (N-benzyl derivatives; 15-31) in general had better activity than N-phenyl derivatives (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation