2015
DOI: 10.1021/jp510083w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Transitions in Monolayer MoS2by Lithium Adsorption

Abstract: Based on first-principles calculations, we study the structural stability of the H and T phases of monolayer MoS 2 upon Li doping. Our calculations demonstrate that it is possible to stabilize the T phase of MoS 2 over the H phase through adsorption of Li atoms on the MoS 2 surface. Through molecular dynamics and phonon calculations we show that the T phase of MoS 2 is dynamically unstable and undergoes considerable distortions. The type of distortion depends on the concentration of adsorbed Li atoms and chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
112
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
12
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, our NEB calculations estimated an activation energy barrier of 0.58 eV for the phase transition from distorted h-RuO 2 to distorted t-RuO 2 . A recent theoretical study of MoS 2 showed that h-MoS 2 is more stable than t-MoS 2 by 0.8 eV, and the activation barrier of the phase transition from t-MoS 2 to h-MoS 2 is 0.79 eV 25 . Although h-MoS 2 is more stable than t-MoS 2 , metastable t-MoS 2 induced by chemical exfoliation has been observed at room temperature 22,26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, our NEB calculations estimated an activation energy barrier of 0.58 eV for the phase transition from distorted h-RuO 2 to distorted t-RuO 2 . A recent theoretical study of MoS 2 showed that h-MoS 2 is more stable than t-MoS 2 by 0.8 eV, and the activation barrier of the phase transition from t-MoS 2 to h-MoS 2 is 0.79 eV 25 . Although h-MoS 2 is more stable than t-MoS 2 , metastable t-MoS 2 induced by chemical exfoliation has been observed at room temperature 22,26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the NEB method has not been included into the main SIESTA code, in this study the diffusion barriers were calculated using a constrained method in the present work, in which the ions were constrained in the direction along the diffusion path, whereas it is allowed to relax in the direction perpendicular to the diffusion path. The diffusion path for the Li, Mg and Al atoms in the MoS 2 monolayer is from a T site to another nearest T site by passing through the metastable H site [38] as shown in Fig. 3 The diffusion coefficient varies exponentially with the diffusion barrier following an Arrhenius-like formula [58]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the thickness of the graphite can significantly improve its energy capacity, and a mono-layer of graphene has much higher energy capacities of 600-1000 mAh/g [9,10]. Other types of monolayer materials such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) [11], V 2 O 5 [12], and transition-metal nitride [13] have also received much attention to be used as the electrode materials for the LIBs. Recently, MoS 2 with a graphite-like layered structure has been explored as a new generation of renewable energy related materials, used as catalysts for dissociation of H 2 O [14], catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction [15], and anode materials for the rechargeable ion batteries [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the other two-dimensional materials such as MoS 2 [6], V 2 O 5 [7] have also received much attention to be used as electrode materials for the LIBs. Two dimensional MoS 2 is a promising material for the LIBs with a large reversible storage capacity of 1290 mAhg -1 and a charge-carrier ~200 cm 2 V -1 s -1 [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%