2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.618697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural-thermal-optical performance (STOP) sensitivity analysis for the James Webb Space Telescope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this assumption is necessary in order to keep the derivations as simple as possible. As our experiments show, the developed algorithm works very well despite the fact that in experiments there might be some deviations from the condition (23). Even without this assumption, it is possible to derive the control algorithm, however, the mathematical apparatus will become more complex and it will involve expectation operators.…”
Section: B Control Algorithm Developmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, this assumption is necessary in order to keep the derivations as simple as possible. As our experiments show, the developed algorithm works very well despite the fact that in experiments there might be some deviations from the condition (23). Even without this assumption, it is possible to derive the control algorithm, however, the mathematical apparatus will become more complex and it will involve expectation operators.…”
Section: B Control Algorithm Developmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Analysis of the changes in the front dome, in terms of physical geometry and refraction, demonstrated that influences on the direction of the emergent ray were mainly of four types, as shown in Figure 3: (a) the thermally induced surface slope changed the direction of normal lines and thus affected the emergent angle; (b) changing the emergent angle of the first surface affected the incident angle of the second surface; (c) changing the refractive index at the incident and emergent points of two surfaces affected the deflection angle; and (d) the radial gradient of the refractive index caused the propagation path to bend. According to the optical sensitivity method [6], the total change of ray propagation direction was equal to the sum of the four changes above. The deduction of the total angle change of emergent ray Δα is described in Appendix B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few thermal analyses have been conducted on airborne rear optical lenses with external load changes. Based on the thermal sensitivity method, Blaurock et al investigated optical sensitivity to temperature using finite element analysis (FEA) [6]. Applewhite et al studied the effects of thermal gradients on the Mars Observer Camera primary mirror [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes field-dependent aberrations and optical component misalignments which are a lingering threat on-orbit due to constantly changing thermal gradients which slowly warp and deform the spacecraft via thermal expansion and contraction. 20 In addition, geometric raytracing is useful for modeling active optics which rely on the bulk motion of optical elements to correct low-order wavefront errors (WFE) caused by optical misalignments. This becomes a powerful tool for correcting errors such as defocus and coma which are typically some of the largest in terms of peak-to-valley (PV) WFE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%