2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832012000600006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural sustainability of cambisol under different land use system

Abstract: SUMMARYIncongruous management techniques have been associated with some significant loss of agricultural land to degradation in many parts of the world. Land degradation results in the alteration of physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil, thereby posing a serious threat to sustainable agricultural development. In this study, our objective is to evaluate the changes in a Cambisol structure under six land use systems using the load bearing capacity model. Sampling was conducted in Amazonas Regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dias Junior and Pierce (1995) pointed out that not every variation in the bulk density and, therefore in total porosity could be considered as degradation of soil structure, this is because the deformations in the secondary compression curve are elastic and recoverable, which, according to this author are variations inadequate to characterize the degradation of soil structure. Similarly, Martins et al (2012) assessing soil structural degradation, also found no changes in values of density and total porosity of the soil in the evaluation of various uses of the soil in the Amazon. It is noted that, in some cases, the evaluation of attributes as density and total porosity of the soil alone are not sensitive enough to research and breakdown the impact of agricultural traffic.…”
Section: Runmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dias Junior and Pierce (1995) pointed out that not every variation in the bulk density and, therefore in total porosity could be considered as degradation of soil structure, this is because the deformations in the secondary compression curve are elastic and recoverable, which, according to this author are variations inadequate to characterize the degradation of soil structure. Similarly, Martins et al (2012) assessing soil structural degradation, also found no changes in values of density and total porosity of the soil in the evaluation of various uses of the soil in the Amazon. It is noted that, in some cases, the evaluation of attributes as density and total porosity of the soil alone are not sensitive enough to research and breakdown the impact of agricultural traffic.…”
Section: Runmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mesmo padrão evidenciou-se na área BA14 na camada 0,1-0,2 m. Para a área AR17 não houve diferenças significativas (p<0,05) entre os valores de PT nas posições avaliadas em nenhuma das profundidades. Esses resultados indicam que esse atributo não foi apropriado para quantificar e avaliar o efeito do manejo da cultura sobre a estrutura do solo (MARTINS et al, 2012b), o que provavelmente pode ser devido ao fato do curto tempo de estabelecimento da cultivar nessa área (Tabela 1). A área AR17 foi instalada em novembro de 2017, cerca de 3,5 anos antes da coleta das amostras de solo.…”
Section: Atributos Físicosunclassified
“…A compactação é representada pelo aumento da densidade e da resistência do solo à penetração (LUCIANO et al, 2012;LOPES et al, 2020), e pode ser facilitada pela quantidade de água no solo. A água funciona como um lubrificante entre as partículas do solo, fazendo com que o mesmo se torne mais susceptível à compactação com o aumento de sua presença (MARTINS et al, 2012). Outra característica relevante para a compactação do solo é a sua textura.…”
Section: Introdução Geralunclassified