2019
DOI: 10.1177/1043659618823915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Stress and Otherness: How Do They Influence Psychological Stress?

Abstract: Background: This study represents the initial steps in researching the cultural distress model and explores the cumulative layering of stressors that place the patient at risk for cultural distress, including structural stress and otherness. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational analysis of intersecting identities (Structural Stressors), ethnicity-related stressors (Otherness) and ethnic-identity (Otherness) on psychological stress. Participants were also asked to define the word culture. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, it is important to create better understanding, definition and dissemination of a framework for understanding, research, and practice that distinguishes "stress" from the "stress response" (113,(123)(124)(125). In this regard, there are emerging molecular studies in the MBT field that tie into the lifestyle medicine research priorities described above (Figure 1).…”
Section: Stress Overview and Prioritized Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, it is important to create better understanding, definition and dissemination of a framework for understanding, research, and practice that distinguishes "stress" from the "stress response" (113,(123)(124)(125). In this regard, there are emerging molecular studies in the MBT field that tie into the lifestyle medicine research priorities described above (Figure 1).…”
Section: Stress Overview and Prioritized Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current COVID-19 pandemic has occurred in the context of stress associated with issues of political, socioeconomic, and racial divisions that is unusual in both scope and intensity (125). Perhaps at no time in recent memory has the ability of individuals, families, and communities to recognize and proactively address mental, physical, and emotional adverse effects from these "acute" catastrophes (COVID-19 illness, mortality, social and economic effects) and "chronic" life-shortening institutional biases (racism, poverty, social disparities) been more needed.…”
Section: Stress Overview and Prioritized Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its corollary, Exclusionary Othering, “utilizes the power within relationships for domination and subordination” (Canales, 2000, p.16). This argument Canales puts forward is built on the premise of the Other being one who is “different from self” (Canales, 2000, p.16) and has seen some concerning uptake within the nursing literature in recent years (Alpers, 2016; DeWilde & Burton, 2017; DeWilde et al, 2019; Haupt, 2015; Kempenaar & Shanmugam, 2018; Jacob & Holmes, 2011; Jackson et al, 2011; Roberts & Schiavenato, 2017; Shea & Gagnon, 2015; Valderama‐Wallace & Apesoa‐Varano, 2019; Woolsey & Narruhn, 2018). The notion of Inclusionary Othering puts the practice of Othering in focus, built on the construction of the Other as different‐from‐oneself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural stress is the burden created by living within socially constructed systems or social structures that disadvantage or marginalize some aspect or aspects of identity (Murry et al, 2018). Experiencing structural stress has been correlated with increased perception of discrimination, psychological stress in relationships, social withdrawal, and self-blame and has been shown to influence health outcomes, including myocardial infarction, low birthweight, diabetes, and chronic pain disorders (Bailey et al, 2017; DeWilde et al, 2019; Molina et al, 2016). Women of color may experience significant structural stress as a result of encounters with ongoing experiences of discrimination, implicit bias, and “othering” in daily life (Liu & Kawachi, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%