2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural stability, half-metallicity and magnetism of the CoFeMnSi/GaAs(001) interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L1 and L2 indicate the interface and subinterface, respectively. It can be seen that the interfacial Mn A atom has an obvious outward extension in MnCo B , MnCo T , MnMn T1 , and MnMn B1 structures, revealing that the interface Mn atom prefers to bond with the interface atom from the spacer layer, and such behavior is also reported in previous theoretical and experimental studies [33,34]. As for the interfacial Mn B atom, it slightly stretches outward in MnMn T2 and MnMn B2 , and keeps its ideal position in MnAl T , while it even shrinks inward in MnAl B , showing that its bonding ability is weaker than interfacial Mn A .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…L1 and L2 indicate the interface and subinterface, respectively. It can be seen that the interfacial Mn A atom has an obvious outward extension in MnCo B , MnCo T , MnMn T1 , and MnMn B1 structures, revealing that the interface Mn atom prefers to bond with the interface atom from the spacer layer, and such behavior is also reported in previous theoretical and experimental studies [33,34]. As for the interfacial Mn B atom, it slightly stretches outward in MnMn T2 and MnMn B2 , and keeps its ideal position in MnAl T , while it even shrinks inward in MnAl B , showing that its bonding ability is weaker than interfacial Mn A .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The chemical potentials of Na, Na, andOc annot exceed those of Na bulk [m Na(bulk) ], Nb bulk [m Nb(bulk) ], and O 2 gas [m O(gas) ]b ecause, if m a ! m a(bulk/gas) ,a ne lement, a,a sasolid or gas, will spontaneously form and hinder any further increase in m a .F or dopants, we suppose that bulk Mo, Cr,a nd N 2 gas are the Mo, Cr,a nd Nr eservoirs, respectively.I na ddition, ass hown in our recent works on intermetallics, [78,79] the minimao fm Na , m Nb ,a nd m O are limited by Equations (6) Figure 3, and the minimum defect formation energies are summarized in Ta ble 2. Monodoping with an atom Mo or Cr is prone to replace one Nb atom under O-rich conditions because defects are indispensable conditions for alternative doping, which is easy in host-poor growth conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ideal properties, such as stable half-metallicity, large spin magnetic moment, and high Curie temperature, can be observed in the ordered bulk phase. Unfortunately, temperature, impurity, and other external factors can disrupt the completely spin-polarized band structures and further degrade the half-metallicity of ideal compounds [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. For example, in the traditional full Heusler compound Co 2 MnSi, a remarkable gap with 0.4 eV in minority band at 985 K may disappear, and only a spin polarization of 61% can be observed at a barrier interface consisting of a single electrode made of a Co 2 MnSi film [35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%