2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10999-019-09451-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural shape optimization with meshless method and swarm-intelligence based optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 Structural optimization has been significantly affected and developed by the development of numerical simulation techniques and optimization algorithms. 8 Structural optimization problems are generally divided into three categories: size, shape, and topology optimization. Size optimization has proven to be extremely important in improving stress concentration, maximum displacement, and structural characteristics such as reducing weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Structural optimization has been significantly affected and developed by the development of numerical simulation techniques and optimization algorithms. 8 Structural optimization problems are generally divided into three categories: size, shape, and topology optimization. Size optimization has proven to be extremely important in improving stress concentration, maximum displacement, and structural characteristics such as reducing weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature has reported on several of these optimization techniques that ensure designing safe, economical, low weight and optimum performing sandwich structures. Among these optimization techniques are Taguchi-Based Method, Fuzzy Logic Method, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Genetic Algorithm and Response Surface Method (RSM), [13,[47][48][49][50]. Lan et.…”
Section: Sandwich Structure Optimization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of optimization methods should ensure convergence as quickly as possible on the basis of global optimization (Bonyadi and Michalewicz, 2017). At present, genetic algorithm (GA) and PSO have recently demonstrated their success and popularity in optimization applications methods, and they are more in line with our optimization requirements (Daxini and Prajapati, 2019). The aforementioned analysis shows that there are three main difficulties in the global optimization of the piezoelectric cantilever shape for energy harvesters: 1) parameterization of the piezoelectric cantilever beam shape; 2) accurate and efficient computation of the output power of energy harvester system; and 3) selection of the optimization method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%