2021
DOI: 10.1177/0954406221993847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength-based design of a fertilizer spreader chassis using computer aided engineering and experimental validation

Abstract: In this research, stress measurement tests and advanced application algorithms based on computer-aided design and engineering (CAD and CAE) were developed and tested. The algorithm was put implemented through a case study on the strength-based structural design and fatigue analysis of a chassis. This algorithm consists of numerical and experimental methods and additionally includes material tests, three-dimensional CAD, a finite element method (FEM)-based analysis procedures, a structural optimization strategy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the finite element analysis solution performed for the application part for a load of 50 kN, the strain at the strain gauge position was obtained as 22.624 MPa (Fig. 13) [2]. This numerical result is very close to the measured stress value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the finite element analysis solution performed for the application part for a load of 50 kN, the strain at the strain gauge position was obtained as 22.624 MPa (Fig. 13) [2]. This numerical result is very close to the measured stress value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The data acquisition system is selected depending on how many gauges will be collected simultaneously. Special software is also used to display and save strain data from the data acquisition system [2]. Connections of the strain gauges and measurement calculations are also a specialty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms that ANSYS results are particularly successful in 2D solution. Çelik et al 66 found a closeness of ∼11.7% in their study, and İrsel 36 found a closeness of about ∼5%. For this reason, researchers determined that the ANSYS results obtained are compatible with both experiments and studies in the literature.
Figure 22. Three-point and four-point bending FEM results for 100 kN load (a) Three-point bending test of X-section beam (b) Four-point bending test of X-section beam (c) Three-point bending test of square section beam and (d) Four-point bending test of square section beam.
Figure 23. Plasticity solutions of beams and experimental results (a) X-section beam three-point FEM solution (b) X-section beam three-point test (c) X-section four-point FEM solution (d) X-section four-point test (e) 120 × 120 × 8 mm square beam three-point FEM solution (f) 120 × 120 × 8 mm square beam three-point test (g) 120 × 120 × 8 mm square beam four-point FEM solution (h) 120 × 120 × 8 mm square beam three-point test.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The skewness value, which shows the mesh quality in the FE model is 0.174. This skewness value is appropriate according to the range of skewness values table and corresponding cell quality 36,52,53 (Figure 15). On the workstation mentioned above, the solutions took an average of 34.9 s, and 8 Gb of Ram was used for the solution.…”
Section: Cad Modeling and Fem Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation