2014
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2014.962671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Seismic Response Mitigation using Optimized Vibro-Impact Nonlinear Energy Sinks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized such sliding friction as damping of the present NES, as it is simpler to implement than viscous damping. Moreover, we neglected frictions of the two guiders coupled to the springs, as they are nonbearing components with much smaller friction forces. Hence, the reaction force of the present NES is F=2k()uuc()1ll02+()uuc21/2+f, where k and l are the constant stiffness and relaxation length of the hinged spring, respectively, and uc=l2l02. …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We utilized such sliding friction as damping of the present NES, as it is simpler to implement than viscous damping. Moreover, we neglected frictions of the two guiders coupled to the springs, as they are nonbearing components with much smaller friction forces. Hence, the reaction force of the present NES is F=2k()uuc()1ll02+()uuc21/2+f, where k and l are the constant stiffness and relaxation length of the hinged spring, respectively, and uc=l2l02. …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance measures were defined by ratios of with control and without control responses . Here, we adopt such performance measures with respect to energy response and displacement drift.…”
Section: Performance Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When investigating the vibration mitigation effect of the NES, the selection of performance measures is very important. In different excitation conditions, researchers adopted different or even multiple indexes, e.g., energy dissipation rate and energy decaying duration in impulsive excitation [28][29][30][31], amplitude of the main system, energy dissipation rate of the NES, energy of the entire system, and transmissibility in harmonic excitation [23,26,32,33], transition probability densities of transmissibility and input energy absorption percentage of the main system in combined harmonic and random excitation [34], and displacement, acceleration, and shear force of the main system in seismic excitation [9,35]. From these studies, the vibration mitigation effect of the NES in harmonic excitation is mainly judged by the absolute number and rate of amplitude and energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an NES system composed by several bumper NESs has been tested on a large‐scale nine‐story frame under impulsive and blast excitations . The bumper NES is another realization method of nonlinear restoring force that makes use of the nonsmooth zig‐zag function, and it is also named as Vibro‐Impact NES . In addition, tracks with specific shapes are used to realize the nonlinearity of restoring force and this type of NES is defined as Type II NES .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%