2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470611708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
157
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
157
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to Section 3, the macroscopic loading applied to rod arises here from the structural analysis of the footbridge, generally realized by finite element method [3]. In this aim, a three dimensional model is established for the Laroin footbridge with finite element code ABAQUS.…”
Section: Reliability Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison to Section 3, the macroscopic loading applied to rod arises here from the structural analysis of the footbridge, generally realized by finite element method [3]. In this aim, a three dimensional model is established for the Laroin footbridge with finite element code ABAQUS.…”
Section: Reliability Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it clearly seems more pertinent to turn towards approximation methods that rely on simplifications of the failure domain: First Order Reliability Method (FORM) or Second Order Reliability Method (SORM) (see detailed explanation in Refs. [2,3]). These techniques are based on a transformation of the parameters from the variables space…”
Section: Reliability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum likelihood process is subject to caution for small data samples. Second, the iso-probabilistic transformation (see for example [24]), also called the Nataf transformation or the Gaussian anamorphosis, consists in applying the data inverse distribution function to the sample. Such a distribution transformation requires the empirical cumulative distribution function, which is built from the data.…”
Section: Transformation To a Gaussian Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for Pf approximation have been developed as well. The most elementary method is to perform a certain number of simulations (Nsim) and estimate Pf as a quotient obtained by dividing the number of failures by the total number of simulations, Nsim [1,2]. The easiest way of selecting the simulations is via the Monte Carlo (MC) method (described later).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%