2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-017-0412-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural pavement assessment in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition data can be surveyed using established image-and laser-based networkwide measurement methods, and then are assessed using an evaluation procedure. In addition, structural measurement systems, such as the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) used to measure the bearing capacity of the pavement structure, have been developed in recent years for networkwide assessment of structural pavement condition (Pinkofsky and Jansen 2018). Complementary to this, related data on the layer structure can be determined indirectly using ground penetrating radar (GPR) (Solla et al 2021) or directly using boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition data can be surveyed using established image-and laser-based networkwide measurement methods, and then are assessed using an evaluation procedure. In addition, structural measurement systems, such as the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) used to measure the bearing capacity of the pavement structure, have been developed in recent years for networkwide assessment of structural pavement condition (Pinkofsky and Jansen 2018). Complementary to this, related data on the layer structure can be determined indirectly using ground penetrating radar (GPR) (Solla et al 2021) or directly using boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The easiest and most accessible method of pavement distress survey is visual inspection by qualified and subjective experts. On the other hand, this method requires a lot of manpower and finances; it is not very time effective and sometimes provides unreliable results (Ragnoli et al, 2018). In order to overcome these disadvantages, various automated devices are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these disadvantages, various automated devices are used. Some of them are used to determine a specific pavement characteristic or distress (such as falling weight deflectometer (FWD) or ground penetrating radar (GPR)), others are multifunctional and register a number of pavement characteristics (such as mobile laboratory RST-28 (Ziliute, Laurinavicius, & Kleiziene, 2011) used in Lithuania or multifunctional measurement vehicle MESAS (Pinkofsky & Jansen, 2018) used in Germany). There have been numerous studies on automatic cracking detection from pavement image data (Gavilán et al, 2011;Lovas, Kertész, Fi, & Barsi, 2008;Wang, Gopalakrishnan, Smadi, & Somani, 2018;Xu & Huang, 2005) or pothole detection using pavement video data (Huidrom, Das, & Sud, 2013;Koch & Brilakis, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%