2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural parameters of collagen nerve grafts influence peripheral nerve regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Stang et al reported that collagen does not seem to be a valuable material for an alternative nerve scaffold (26). The present study has shown, for the first time, that the rat CSF in collagen guide channel enhances peripheral nerve regeneration significantly more than the collagen guide channel without CSF in vivo.…”
Section: Sciatic Functional Index (Sfi)supporting
confidence: 44%
“…Stang et al reported that collagen does not seem to be a valuable material for an alternative nerve scaffold (26). The present study has shown, for the first time, that the rat CSF in collagen guide channel enhances peripheral nerve regeneration significantly more than the collagen guide channel without CSF in vivo.…”
Section: Sciatic Functional Index (Sfi)supporting
confidence: 44%
“…Also, collagen supports cell proliferation and tissue regeneration [65,73,104]. As nerve conduits collagen allows the establishment of topographical cues that guide axons to regrow [105,106] and has shown excellent cell adhesive properties that encourage cell attachment and proliferation [106,107]. The degradation time of the collagen conduits is relatively prolonged and takes up to 48 months which can cause nerve compression and fibrosis [84].…”
Section: Collagenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uneven fibre distribution and nerve growth inhibition caused by fibre overlapping are some of the disadvantages associated with this type of conduits. However, association with wall guides helps to avoid this problem [105,187,188].…”
Section: Conduits Structure Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user needs to maintain a sufficient balance between time of production (D) G-ratio was significantly lower in the autograft group versus all conduit groups. The ideal g-ratio is between 0.6 and 0.7 [30]. (E) There was no significant difference seen in the unmyelinated fibre diameter between all experimental groups (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…G-ratio was taken as the ratio of inner axonal diameter to the total axonal diameter and was used as a functional index of myelination. The ideal g-ratio was taken to be approximately between 0.6 and 0.7 [30]. All parameters were quantified using an upright florescent microscope (BX51 Upright Fluorescent Microscope Ò ; Olympus Inc.) and analysed using ImageJ image analysis software (NIH, Bethesda, USA).…”
Section: Morphology and Stereologymentioning
confidence: 99%