2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural operational semantics for stochastic and weighted transition systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover our technique is such that the presence of Markovian delays in the process algebra does not cause a significant modification of the process algebra semantics, in that most of the burden is concentrated in a couple of additional rules which are independent of the particular operators used by the algebra. More precisely, we do not have to introduce an explicit (operator dependent) mechanism to distinguish multiple occurrences of actions as in [11,18], or to intervene in the semantics of every operator as in [7] or to separately define, by induction on term syntax, how rate distribution is calculated using (total) rate information attached to rules as in [9] (which also does not cope with recursion). But more importantly, this opens the new possibility to introduce Markovian delays in complex languages like that of [15] without the need to completely change the semantics from reduction style to labeled style.…”
Section: The Main Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover our technique is such that the presence of Markovian delays in the process algebra does not cause a significant modification of the process algebra semantics, in that most of the burden is concentrated in a couple of additional rules which are independent of the particular operators used by the algebra. More precisely, we do not have to introduce an explicit (operator dependent) mechanism to distinguish multiple occurrences of actions as in [11,18], or to intervene in the semantics of every operator as in [7] or to separately define, by induction on term syntax, how rate distribution is calculated using (total) rate information attached to rules as in [9] (which also does not cope with recursion). But more importantly, this opens the new possibility to introduce Markovian delays in complex languages like that of [15] without the need to completely change the semantics from reduction style to labeled style.…”
Section: The Main Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, techniques exploiting the representation of Markovian transitions collectively as a distribution over a target state space (a traditional approach in the context of probabilistic transition systems, see Giry functor [10] and its generalizations, for instance [20,8,22]) have been used in [7] and in [9] for any Markovian process algebra whose operational rules are in a Markovian extension of the GSOS rule format. These techniques are crucially based on collectively inferring Markovian transitions performable at a certain syntactical level (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4]. On deterministic MTS, these operations can be given easily using simple structural operational rules (for such semantics of weighted systems, see for instance [43]). For non-deterministic specifications this is significantly harder; in [10] it is shown that DMTS and NAA permit these operations and, additionally but trivially, disjunction.…”
Section: Specification Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Götz et al [10] have used stochastic process algebra in studying correctness and performance analysis of multiprocessors and distributed system design. Klin and Sassone [15,16] have explored using monoidal structures for stochastic SOS, an elegant approach that unifies various different operational semantic models into a single algebraic frame. This approach has been taken further by Bernardo et al [7] in finding a unifying structure for dealing with probabilistic, stochastic and time-dependent nondeterminism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%