“…[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] For mica, e.g., the radius of the protrusions 46 coincides well with the track radius deduced from other techniques 24 since the protrusions are negligible due to fresh cleaving or very little on a surface directly exposed to ion irradiation (in contrast to other materials, the height of the protrusions in mica are too small for quantitative size analysis 47 ). The results obtained from several direct (TEM, SFM) and indirect [Mössbauer spectrometry, Channeling Rutherford Backscattering (C-RBS) and x-ray diffraction (XRD)] observation methods lead to a consistent determination of the S e thresholds in various amorphizable insulators including mica, 24,43,46,48,50,51 yttrium iron garnet (Y 3 Fe 5 O 12 ), 52,53 gadolinium gallium garnet (Gd 3 Ga 5 O 12 ), 54,55 and crystalline quartz (SiO 2 ). 30,56 When comparing track sizes and S e thresholds from different irradiation experiments, it is important to check if the velocities of the projectiles are similar.…”