2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural modification of poly (methyl methacrylate) due to electron irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, when ZEP and PMMA were compared, the higher etch resistance of ZEP observed was attributed to the a-methylstyrene moiety. 15 As reported in our previous paper, the etch durability of SML is very similar to that of the ZEP resist 8 and can be attributed to the presence of the a-methylstyrene group, as revealed by the FTIR analysis of SML, and its effect on the lithographic performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, when ZEP and PMMA were compared, the higher etch resistance of ZEP observed was attributed to the a-methylstyrene moiety. 15 As reported in our previous paper, the etch durability of SML is very similar to that of the ZEP resist 8 and can be attributed to the presence of the a-methylstyrene group, as revealed by the FTIR analysis of SML, and its effect on the lithographic performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…In a recent FTIR study of PMMA, to understand the reaction mechanism after e-beam irradiation, it was found that an increase in the C¼C bonds along with the increase in the e-beam dose led to the main chain scission of the PMMA polymer chains. 15 Breaking of the carbonyl group in the polymer was also reported after ebeam radiation. Since the spectra in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The different reactions of PMMA and PS to electron irradiation have been discussed in the literature for a long time. Scission of the polymer chains into smaller molecules is the primary process occurring in PMMA, whereas in PS, cross-link formation between the polymer chains is predominant. , It is notable that the diameters measured by SEM are less than those measured by DLS (given in Table )for the PTFE–PS particles, this difference is typically within the amount expected due to the difference between hydrodynamic and “dry” diameters. For the PTFE–PMMA particles, however, this difference is considerably larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The difference in diameter between DLS and SEM measurements is notably greater for the PMMA-coated particles, which may be partially explained by a combination of swelling of the PMMA due to absorbed water, and the difference in hydrophilicity of the materials resulting in a larger hydrodynamic diameter for the PMMA-coated particles with respect to the PS-coated particles. A more significant factor in this difference in behavior may be due to the PMMA shell shrinking under electron irradiation; PMMA is a well-known positive photoresist for both photolithography and electron beam lithography . Conversely, PS is a negative photoresist and can be expected to be more dimensionally stable under electron beam irradiation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation