2016
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20160136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Model and De-Intercalation Kinetics of Kaolinite-Methanol-Sodium Stearate Intercalation Compound

Abstract: Kaolinite-methanol-sodium stearate intercalation compound (Ka-MeOH-SS) was prepared by intercalation of kaolinite with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) followed by displacing of DMSO with methanol and methanol by sodium stearate. The sample was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermal analysis (thermogravimetry (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results show that the basal spacing of Ka-MeOH-SS was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of calculated intercalation free energies for the three surfactants agrees with the experimentally observed intercalation trend that the CTAC can more easily achieve the intercalation and surface modification of methanol preintercalated kaolinite compared with stearate and dodecylamine. 10,12,38 It is interesting to note that the PMF of CTAC (Figure 2) has the bumpy feature before completely entering the kaolinite interlayer. The local maximums of the free energies along the reaction coordinate represent the energy barrier when CTAC continually move into the interlayer, which are related with the transfer of the head group N(CH 3 ) 3 + of CTAC above the adjacent ditrigonal cavities on the siloxane surface in the kaolinite interlayer.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of calculated intercalation free energies for the three surfactants agrees with the experimentally observed intercalation trend that the CTAC can more easily achieve the intercalation and surface modification of methanol preintercalated kaolinite compared with stearate and dodecylamine. 10,12,38 It is interesting to note that the PMF of CTAC (Figure 2) has the bumpy feature before completely entering the kaolinite interlayer. The local maximums of the free energies along the reaction coordinate represent the energy barrier when CTAC continually move into the interlayer, which are related with the transfer of the head group N(CH 3 ) 3 + of CTAC above the adjacent ditrigonal cavities on the siloxane surface in the kaolinite interlayer.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific benefits of kaolinite come from its distinct structure, natural abundance, and relatively low cost. Structurally, kaolinite has a basic unit cell consisting of a tetrahedral silica sheet and an octahedral alumina sheet along the c -axis . Kaolinite exhibits relatively high reactivity toward chemical modification due to the presence of surface hydroxyl groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a limited number of micromolecules can be directly intercalated, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, urea, and N -methylformamide, owing to the adjacent layers being linked by hydrogen bonds, in which the interlayer spacing is difficult to be enlarged. With pre-intercalation of micromolecules, more larger molecules have been successfully intercalated, such as methanol, series alkylamines, series quaternary ammonium salts, , and series fatty acids and salts . However, the chemical intercalation process is usually harsh and has lower intercalation rate, consumes more time and energy, and is environmentally unfriendly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With preintercalation of micromolecules, more larger molecules have been successfully intercalated, such as methanol, 23−25 series alkylamines, 26 series quaternary ammonium salts, 27,28 and series fatty acids and salts. 29 process is usually harsh and has lower intercalation rate, consumes more time and energy, and is environmentally unfriendly.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%