2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, mechanical and electronic properties of OsTM and TMOs2 (TM=Ti, Zr and Hf): First-principles calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In detail, the H f values calculated by GGA method are typically more negative than LDA method. For HfOs, the calculated H f value by GGA method is in good consistency with experimental value [24] and theoretical value from Liu's work [14], but smaller than Xing's [6] and Levy's [3] reports. For HfIr and HfPt, our calculated H f values are both smaller than theoretical values from Xing's work [6] and experimental values from Gachon's report [25].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In detail, the H f values calculated by GGA method are typically more negative than LDA method. For HfOs, the calculated H f value by GGA method is in good consistency with experimental value [24] and theoretical value from Liu's work [14], but smaller than Xing's [6] and Levy's [3] reports. For HfIr and HfPt, our calculated H f values are both smaller than theoretical values from Xing's work [6] and experimental values from Gachon's report [25].…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Generally, the qualities for structural optimizations in HfX compounds using both GGA and LDA methods are comparable and acceptable. In detail, the optimized lattice constants for HfOs and HfIr are in good agreement with theoretical values [6,13,14], respectively. For HfOs and HfIr, the LDA computed values are more approaching to the experimental value.…”
Section: Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated results are listed in Table 2. The obtained formation enthalpies of the In-Zr compounds are all negative, meaning that they are all stable at 0 K and 0 GPa [13]. We can see that the formation enthalpy of InZr is the lowest contrast with -In 3 Zr, In 2 Zr, and InZr 3 , which implies that InZr is the most stable among four Zr-In compounds.…”
Section: Zrmentioning
confidence: 78%