2010
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02662-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus Transmission by Its Insect Vector

Abstract: Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is transmitted from plant to plant through a seemingly simple interaction with insect vectors. This process involves an aphid receptor and two viral proteins, P2 and P3. P2 binds to both the aphid receptor and P3, itself tightly associated with the virus particle, with the ensemble forming a transmissible viral complex. Here, we describe the conformations of both unliganded CaMV P3 protein and its virion-associated form. X-ray crystallography revealed that the N-terminal domain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, an equivalent RPS2 product was identified in cast cuticles from Anopheles gambiae after moulting (He et al, 2007), a fact that provides at least preliminary evidence for its presence in insect cuticles. Further work will be needed to confirm whether this is also the case for aphids, and particularly for the structures considered essential for virus transmission that have been described recently in aphid stylets (Uzest et al, 2010). Our results also raise an interesting question from an evolutionary perspective, that of how an insect ribosomal protein could become a specific receptor for a plant virus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, an equivalent RPS2 product was identified in cast cuticles from Anopheles gambiae after moulting (He et al, 2007), a fact that provides at least preliminary evidence for its presence in insect cuticles. Further work will be needed to confirm whether this is also the case for aphids, and particularly for the structures considered essential for virus transmission that have been described recently in aphid stylets (Uzest et al, 2010). Our results also raise an interesting question from an evolutionary perspective, that of how an insect ribosomal protein could become a specific receptor for a plant virus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In this virus, particles form a stable complex with the viral P3 protein, which is then retained in the aphid vector stylets via an interaction with the aphid transmission factor P2 (Leh et al, 1999;Plisson et al, 2005;Hoh et al, 2010 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another signal pattern might trigger release of virions from VFs without simultaneous mixed-network formation, allowing virions to interact with P1 and leading to cell-to-cell movement. The nature of the signals and whether they overlap remains unknown; we propose that the previously hypothesized redox switch involving the cysteine ring of P3 plays a role as a signal receptor (40). P3 is indeed a good candidate, because it is strategically well placed on the virus capsid surface (10), interacting with P1 and P2, and it is found in both VFs and TBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…e During aphid vector probing punctures, the stylets visit a small number of epidermis and mesophyll cells. f-g According to the speculation by Hoh et al (2010), a change in the redox state induced by the aphid puncture and/or the saliva could result in disintegration of the TB and the release of P2 and P3 (orange). h Subsequently, P2 can be acquired by the aphid and attach to a receptor protein in the stylet cuticle.…”
Section: Camv Transmission: Implication Of the Host In Virus-vector Imentioning
confidence: 99%