2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41421-022-00437-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural insights into the activation of neurokinin 2 receptor by neurokinin A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peptides were purified by reversed‐phase (RP)‐high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and characterized by mass‐spectrometry (MS) (Figure S1). The addition of a triglycine motif to the N ‐terminus of these tachykinins was not expected to substantially alter their activity, as the region responsible for receptor activation resides in the C ‐terminus (FXGLM‐NH2), while the N‐terminal region contributes to receptor subtype selectivity (Sun et al, 2022). The activities of NKA and SP 6–11 were compared to their triglycine extended analogues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peptides were purified by reversed‐phase (RP)‐high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and characterized by mass‐spectrometry (MS) (Figure S1). The addition of a triglycine motif to the N ‐terminus of these tachykinins was not expected to substantially alter their activity, as the region responsible for receptor activation resides in the C ‐terminus (FXGLM‐NH2), while the N‐terminal region contributes to receptor subtype selectivity (Sun et al, 2022). The activities of NKA and SP 6–11 were compared to their triglycine extended analogues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of a triglycine motif to the N -terminus of these tachykinins was not expected to substantially alter their activity, as the region responsible for receptor activation resides in the C -terminus (FXGLM-NH2), while the N-terminal region contributes to receptor subtype selectivity. 18 The activities of NKA and SP 6-11 were compared to their triglycine extended analogues. This comparison showed modest effects for triglycine extension, except for G3SP 6-11 (EC 50 0.3 nM), which was almost 100 times more potent than SP 6-11 (27.5 nM) in signaling through the G q pathway (Figure S2) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding selectivity depends on the C-terminal end and the interactions of amino acids of the rest of the molecule with the receptor. A recent cryo-EM structure determination of NK-2R-Gq protein complex bound to NKA [ 60 ] underlies the importance of several residues that secure the position of NKA within de receptor pocket (see Figure 4 D). Lateral chains of residues Y93 and N90 and N97 in TM2 interact with the backbone carbonyl oxygens of Val7 and Leu9.…”
Section: Tachykinin and Calcitonin Peptide Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the N-terminus of NKA contacts the ECL2 region of NK-2R (D175 forms a salt bridge with Lys2 carbonyl oxygen), and Phe6 further contacts Met28 in the N-terminal part of NK-2R and I285 in TM7 ( Figure 4 D). When Sun et al [ 60 ] compared NK-2R with NK-1R (PDB ID 7RMG, [ 61 ]), they found very similar structures, except for an outward shift of the TM5 in NK-2R of 2.4 Å. Moreover, they identified significant differences in the arrangement of extracellular loops, specially ECL2.…”
Section: Tachykinin and Calcitonin Peptide Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation