2000
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.00407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice

Abstract: The growing interest in Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques and recognition of their importance in IS research suggests the need to compare and contrast different types of SEM techniques so that research designs can be selected appropriately. After assessing the extent to which these techniques are currently being used in IS research, the article presents a running example which analyzes the same dataset via three very different statistical techniques. It then compares two classes of SEM: covariance-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

76
2,974
6
87

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,687 publications
(3,482 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
76
2,974
6
87
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we can use the second-generation statistical technique, namely structural equation modeling (SEM), when the sample size is above 200 (Hair et al 2006). SEM can examine multiple causal relationships simultaneously and have more rigorous analysis results (Gefen et al 2000). Second, this study only considers two types of channels: Internet and physical channels, and only analyze how channel characteristics influence the channel attitudes of multi-channel research shoppers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we can use the second-generation statistical technique, namely structural equation modeling (SEM), when the sample size is above 200 (Hair et al 2006). SEM can examine multiple causal relationships simultaneously and have more rigorous analysis results (Gefen et al 2000). Second, this study only considers two types of channels: Internet and physical channels, and only analyze how channel characteristics influence the channel attitudes of multi-channel research shoppers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is exploratory in nature, the sample size (n ¼ 175) is less than the minimum recommended number of cases for covariance-based structural equation modeling methodologies such as LISREL, EQS, or AMOS, and it cannot be assumed that the data follows a normal distribution. Given these conditions, PLS is the most appropriate analytical tool [ChNe98;GeSB00]. Accordingly, PLS Graph version 3.0 was used to analyze the data and test the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common method used to determine confidence intervals for the path coefficients is bootstrapping. This process involves taking repeated samples (with replacement) from the original data set, and using these samples to determine a t-value for each path coefficient [Chin98b;GeSB00]. Applying the associated bootstrap technique to this study, with the number of iterations set at 500, resulted in the significance levels shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagozzi and Yi (1988) proposed confirmatory factor analysis evaluation criteria and both Anderson and Gerbing (1988) and Gefen et al (2000) recommended to assess data with model fit index for measurement model. The measurement model showed adequate fit: v 2 = 1087.775, df = 467, v 2 /df = 2.329, GFI = 0.915, AGFI = 0.898, RMSEA = 0.043, RMSR = 0.040, NFI = 0.932, CFI = 0.960 (see Table 1).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%