2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(99)00055-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural design of stainless steel members — comparison between Eurocode 3, Part 1.4 and test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the experimental data reported in [34], EN 1993-1-4 [6] The mean ratios of the predicted-to-test resistances (NEN1993-1-4/Nu) are shown in Table 13.…”
Section: Column Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the experimental data reported in [34], EN 1993-1-4 [6] The mean ratios of the predicted-to-test resistances (NEN1993-1-4/Nu) are shown in Table 13.…”
Section: Column Bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experimental and numerical studies into the behaviour and design of circular hollow section structural members have been carried out, aiming at verifying their performance under varying loading conditions, assessing the efficiency of the established design codes, and developing more economic design approaches. A series of stub column [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and bending [3,11,12] tests have been performed on CHS of varying cross-section classes, in order to investigate their local buckling behaviour and the corresponding loading-carrying and deformation capacities under isolated loading conditions. Zhao et al [13] conducted a comprehensive experimental programme on eccentrically loaded stub columns to study the structural performance of stainless steel CHS subjected to combined axial load and bending moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardner et al [21] also proposed revised slenderness limits for the classification of circular hollow sections, leading to improved capacity predictions than the codified limits, compared to previous limits. Although comprehensive research has been conducted on the local buckling behaviour of CHS, research into the member stability remains relatively scarce, despite some previous study on columns [1][2][3] and beam-columns [2,3]. The structural performance of CHS members requires further investigation and this is therefore the subject of the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bredenkamp and Van den Berg [4] carried out two stub column tests and thirteen long column tests on welded I-columns of Grade 3CR12. Burgan et al [5] reported fifteen long column tests on welded I-columns of Grade S304 and S31803. Up to date, a total of twenty eight long column tests are available on the welded I-sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%