Structural Biology in Drug Discovery 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781118681121.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Chemogenomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the sparse set is only 15% bigger than the dense set, its small molecules number is ~74 times more prominent ( Fig 3B ). The densely-covered test set represents a typical chemogenomics [ 1 , 82 , 83 ] or proteochemometrics [ 8 , 9 ] matrix where each small molecule is experimentally validated on at least 60 kinases (out of 69 in total). The structures of the 278 inhibitors of the dense set can be found in S3 Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the sparse set is only 15% bigger than the dense set, its small molecules number is ~74 times more prominent ( Fig 3B ). The densely-covered test set represents a typical chemogenomics [ 1 , 82 , 83 ] or proteochemometrics [ 8 , 9 ] matrix where each small molecule is experimentally validated on at least 60 kinases (out of 69 in total). The structures of the 278 inhibitors of the dense set can be found in S3 Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average cost of developing a new drug has increased by a factor of 9 in the last 50 years. [1] And although personalized therapies are steadily showing their value in clinical trials, [2,3] these trials can suffer from therapy resistance, [4][5][6] requiring adaptive treatment strategies. Network-based and proteochemometrics approaches [7][8][9] introduced a decade ago offer a paradigm shift from highly selective single-target drugs to multi-target drugs where the latter is more likely to achieve desired clinical efficacy and potentially lower the research and development (R&D) costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average cost of developing a new drug has increased by a factor of 9 in the last 50 years. [402] And although personalized therapies are steadily showing their value in clinical trials, [30,31] these trials can suffer from therapy resistance, [3,32,33] requiring adaptive treatment strategies. Network-based and proteochemometrics approaches [82,176,403] introduced a decade ago offer a paradigm shift from highly selective single-target drugs to multi-target drugs where the latter is more likely to achieve desired clinical efficacy and potentially lower the research and development (R&D) costs.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the sparse set is only 15% bigger than the dense set, its small molecules number is ~74 times more prominent (Figure 5.3). The densely-covered test set represents a typical chemogenomics [145,153,402] or proteochemometrics [82,176] matrix…”
Section: Protein Features Contribute To Better Scoring Of Machine Lea...mentioning
confidence: 99%