2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural characteristics and LA–ICP-MS U–Pb zircon geochronology of the deformed granitic rocks from the Mesozoic Xingcheng-Taili ductile shear zone in the North China Craton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zircons with U-Pb ages of~2,500 and~1,850 Ma are identical to those from the Archaean basement and Palaeo-Proterozoic multistage cratonization of the NCC (e.g., Liang et al, 2015;Wan et al, 2006;Santosh, 2010;Wang et al, 2018;Zhai, 2011Zhai, , 2014Zhai & Santosh, 2011;Zhao et al, 2001;Zhao & Guo, 2012;Zhao et al, 2005;Zhao, Wilde, Cawood, & Lu, 1998;Zhao & Zhai, 2013;Zhou, Zhang, Li, Wang, & Liu, 2017; Figure 9g). All these groups constitute a typical NCC detrital zircon signature (Cope, 2003(Cope, , 2017 Gao et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2009;Li, Li, & Lu, 1995;Li et al, 2011;Liu, Santosh, Wang, Bai, & Yang, 2011;Liu, Zhao, Liu, & Shi, 2014;Sun et al, 2013;Wan et al, 2003;Wan et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2013;Lu & Li, 1991;Peng et al, 2012; Figure 10).…”
Section: Age Constraint Of Haifanggou Formationmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zircons with U-Pb ages of~2,500 and~1,850 Ma are identical to those from the Archaean basement and Palaeo-Proterozoic multistage cratonization of the NCC (e.g., Liang et al, 2015;Wan et al, 2006;Santosh, 2010;Wang et al, 2018;Zhai, 2011Zhai, , 2014Zhai & Santosh, 2011;Zhao et al, 2001;Zhao & Guo, 2012;Zhao et al, 2005;Zhao, Wilde, Cawood, & Lu, 1998;Zhao & Zhai, 2013;Zhou, Zhang, Li, Wang, & Liu, 2017; Figure 9g). All these groups constitute a typical NCC detrital zircon signature (Cope, 2003(Cope, , 2017 Gao et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2009;Li, Li, & Lu, 1995;Li et al, 2011;Liu, Santosh, Wang, Bai, & Yang, 2011;Liu, Zhao, Liu, & Shi, 2014;Sun et al, 2013;Wan et al, 2003;Wan et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2013;Lu & Li, 1991;Peng et al, 2012; Figure 10).…”
Section: Age Constraint Of Haifanggou Formationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Zircons with U–Pb ages of ~2,500 and ~1,850 Ma are identical to those from the Archaean basement and Palaeo‐Proterozoic multi‐stage cratonization of the NCC (e.g., Liang et al, ; Wan et al, ; Santosh, ; Wang et al, ; Zhai, , ; Zhai & Santosh, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao & Guo, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao, Wilde, Cawood, & Lu, ; Zhao & Zhai, ; Zhou, Zhang, Li, Wang, & Liu, ; Figure g). All these groups constitute a typical NCC detrital zircon signature (Cope, , ).…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of Mesozoic intrusive rocks were exposed in the study area, most of which were Late Jurassic granites, and minors formed in Late Triassic and Early Cretaceous ( Figure 2). The Neoarchean granitic rocks are exposed in the middle part of the study area among the Mesozoic granites as giant xenoliths, mainly composed of granitic gneiss and biotite-plagioclase gneiss [17,28,48,49]. The Late Triassic and Early Cretaceous rocks are mainly porphyritic granitic gneiss and some light colored dikes of granites, respectively.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late Jurassic adamellites, which are granites rich in plagioclases and K-feldspars, are the largest intrusive magmatic rocks in the northern and southern sectors of the study area, and some dikes of biotite adamellites intrude the Neoarchean granite gneisses. These rocks show a massive structure in the south and a gneissic structure with shear fabrics in the north [28].…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite strain measurements are used to determine the magnitude and orientation of the strain ellipsoid and deformation regime, and it is an indispensable part of the modern structural geological and rheological research (Bailey & Eyster, ; Li et al, 2017; C. Y. Liang, Liu, Meng, et al, ; C. Liang, Liu, Neubauer, Bernroider, et al, ; C. Liang, Liu, Neubauer, Jin, et al, ; Zheng & Chang, ). Regarding to the strain measurements, a lot of methods can be chosen such as Fry's method, long–short axis, ellipse of inertia, R f /φ, Elliott's method, and neighbour centre‐to‐centre method (Ramsay, ; Shao, Liu, Jia, Li, & Jin, ; Zheng & Chang, ).…”
Section: Estimation Of Finite Strain and Kinematic Vorticitymentioning
confidence: 99%