1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4983(90)90011-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural change in interdependent bureaucracies: Was Rome's failure economic or military?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Proposition 2, if military scale economies decline, the size of the typical state will fall and its degree of centralization rise. Trends in these two directions were apparent throughout the first millennium A.D., the period of diffusion of heavy-cavalry techniques (see Dudley, 1990). During the middle decades of the third century A.D., centralized power collapsed in the Roman empire (as it did in China).…”
Section: The Size and Degree Of Centralization Of Statesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Proposition 2, if military scale economies decline, the size of the typical state will fall and its degree of centralization rise. Trends in these two directions were apparent throughout the first millennium A.D., the period of diffusion of heavy-cavalry techniques (see Dudley, 1990). During the middle decades of the third century A.D., centralized power collapsed in the Roman empire (as it did in China).…”
Section: The Size and Degree Of Centralization Of Statesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The more recent attempt I know of is the collective book edited by Bernholz and Vaubel (2004). 12 See Dudley (1990Dudley ( , 1991Dudley ( , 1997. This author highlights also the effect on taxes, though not on political representation.…”
Section: Changes In the Equilibrium Of The Autocrat And The Institutimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Just the same, progress in defensive techniques favoured the few against the many as well as the cities against the kings, and the contrary occurred with progress in offensive ones. To take another instance, also invoked by Dudley (1990), the Romans' proficiency in siege warfare, their use of missile weapons (the pila of legionaries) and the flexibility of the Roman infantry formations put in their hands the means to conquer their Empire at a low cost. 16 In turn, the invention of the stirrup and saddle, together with breeding of new races of stronger horses able to carry an armoured cavalryman and a harness for themselves, enhanced the effectiveness of mounted troops, letting the Roman infantry obsolete in the face of these quickly-moving enemies and re-establishing constant returns to scale for centuries.…”
Section: Changes In the Equilibrium Of The Autocrat And The Institutimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bernholz and Vaubel (2004) are also unable to account for the failure of Southeast Asia to be at the forefront of human civilizations despite several potentially-advantageous factors: the continuous functioning of a Southeast Asian state system since the late classical era, the auspicious position of Southeast Asia as a crossroads of major civilizations, and the abundance of resources in Southeast 16 Kennedy (1987) has the same finding. The economies of scale in conflict (or the returns to scale in conflict, or military decisiveness, or the mass factor-terms which are used interchangeably in this book), are well-studied by scholars such as Dudley (1990Dudley ( , 1991Dudley ( , 1992 and Hirshleifer (1995). 19 It also occupies a prominent position in many grand strategy theories such as that of Wittman (1991).…”
Section: Jimmy Tengmentioning
confidence: 99%