2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-1389-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural behavior of strengthening masonry in-filled frames subjected to lateral load using bonded and un-bonded CFRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large part of the research studies, found through investigations, has been devoted to preearthquake retrofitting. For example, Kassem et al [12] studied the mechanical behaviors of single-story brick masonry in-filled frames under the effect of lateral loads; Baloević et al [13] investigated the effect of plaster on the performance of single-story single-bay masonry-infilled steel frames under in-plane base acceleration using a shake-table; and Messali et al [14] proposed a pre-earthquake retrofitting for a masonry typology widely used in social housing.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Retrofitting Of Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large part of the research studies, found through investigations, has been devoted to preearthquake retrofitting. For example, Kassem et al [12] studied the mechanical behaviors of single-story brick masonry in-filled frames under the effect of lateral loads; Baloević et al [13] investigated the effect of plaster on the performance of single-story single-bay masonry-infilled steel frames under in-plane base acceleration using a shake-table; and Messali et al [14] proposed a pre-earthquake retrofitting for a masonry typology widely used in social housing.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Retrofitting Of Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the unreinforced cement mortar, traditional retro tting methods improve the tensile strain capacity of the tested specimens by less than 0.015% and increase the bearing capacity of the specimens by a maximum of 3.5 MPa. The primary advantages of using polymer bers include the ease of execution, no increase in the weight of the structure [10], and improvement of the energy dissipation of masonry walls [11]. Despite the mentioned advantages, the use of FRP in strengthening and retro t is subject to such drawbacks as inability to be used on wet surfaces, reduced performance at high temperatures and in alkaline environments (which are an integral part of masonry structures), inevitable potential hazards for workers, and the incompatibility of resin with the masonry materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%