2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24486-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis for proficient oxidized ribonucleotide insertion in double strand break repair

Abstract: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) oxidize cellular nucleotide pools and cause double strand breaks (DSBs). Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) attaches broken chromosomal ends together in mammalian cells. Ribonucleotide insertion by DNA polymerase (pol) μ prepares breaks for end-joining and this is required for successful NHEJ in vivo. We previously showed that pol μ lacks discrimination against oxidized dGTP (8-oxo-dGTP), that can lead to mutagenesis, cancer, aging and human disease. Here we reveal the structural b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ROS accumulation can impair DNA DSBs repair or homologous recombination. 7 , 8 , 36 During meiosis, DNA DSBs lead to phosphorylation of γH2AX by the activation of ataxia telangiectasia‐mutated (ATM) protein kinase. 24 Most DNA DSBs are repaired during the zygotene to pachytene stages except for the sex chromosomes, and some DSBs go through crossover resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ROS accumulation can impair DNA DSBs repair or homologous recombination. 7 , 8 , 36 During meiosis, DNA DSBs lead to phosphorylation of γH2AX by the activation of ataxia telangiectasia‐mutated (ATM) protein kinase. 24 Most DNA DSBs are repaired during the zygotene to pachytene stages except for the sex chromosomes, and some DSBs go through crossover resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 Under normal physiological conditions, ROS oxidizes cellular nucleotide pools and causes DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs), and DNA repair may occur downstream. 7 , 8 If DSBs are neither repaired nor removed, the DNA damage response triggers cell death. 9 , 10 On radiation exposure, PEX5 participated in DSBs repair and homologous recombination by consuming excessive ROS, 11 which protected hepatocellular carcinoma cells from radiation‐induced damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent findings indicate that ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA (Pryor et al, 2018) and/or damage‐induced long non‐coding RNA (Michelini et al, 2017) promotes the successful processing of DSBs. In addition, oxidized ribonucleotides (8‐oxo‐rGTP) can be efficiently incorporated by DNA polymerase μ during DSB repair by NHEJ (Jamsen et al, 2021) resulting in substrates containing lesions in both DNA strands. Improved destruction of oxidized ribonucleoside triphosphates by overexpressed hMTH1 might reduce the incorporation of potentially inhibitory oxidized ribonucleotides, thereby promoting efficient DSB rejoining and preventing micronucleus formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both single-and double-stranded breaks (SSB and DSB) are a common feature of cell karyotype studies after cannabis exposure [7][8][9][10]12,13,99]. It therefore becomes important in the present context to note that the epigenome plays an often determinative role in influencing or selecting the site of DNA breakage generally [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], during meiotic crossing over [132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139], in the immune gene hypervariable region [140][141][142][143][144][145][146], and in oncogenic pathways [120,123,124,[147][148][149][150][151][152][153]…”
Section: Epigenomic Impacts On Dna Breakage Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tumor almost invariably involves the development of an isochromosome 12p. Its presence is explained by the concept of presumptive pericentromeric chromatin dysregulation as the dysregulated pericentromeric epigenome presumably facilitates the aberrant scission of the chromosome at the centromere, forming the isochromosome through the interactions between the epigenome and the genome as described above [118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131]. The presence of KIT and KRAS (and to a lesser extent NRAS) on chromosome 12 then confers a growth advantage on the mutant clone, and malignant tumorigenesis is the end result of this process continued in the context of the gross re-sculpting of the chromosomal landscape by repeated cycles of the breakage-fusion-bridge cycle across multiple cell divisions that accumulate over time.…”
Section: Cannabinoids Deliver Multiple Carcinogenic Insultsmentioning
confidence: 99%